|
[Sponsors] |
October 8, 2003, 10:53 |
vorticity velocity method
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi I have a problem about rate of convergency of a code I used vorticity velocity with mack's staggered grid . both transiant and steady solution have same low rate of convergency . I solve a 2 lapplace equation for u and v velocity and a equation for vorticity . I can explain more about it if you like to help me .
thanks for paying attention . |
|
October 8, 2003, 22:51 |
Re: vorticity velocity method
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Convergence depends on how convection dominate (how large is Re), how nonhomogenious the grid is. Numerical solution of Possion equation can be accelerated by a multigrid method in general.
|
|
October 9, 2003, 11:48 |
Re: vorticity velocity method
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hello dear friend thanks for paying attention . I use point jacobi for both poissons' equation and for solving vorticity equation too . when I compare vorticity calculated from curl of momentum equation ( solved by point jacobi) with vorticity calculated from definition , I find large diffrence between these two value .
I use suitable grid and reynold's number but I think that there is something I didnot consider. I wrote a code using SIMPLE algorithm it converges so fast but when I compare these two codes I find out that I it too slow , but I have heard that vorticity velocity method is faster than SIMLPE alg . I'll be glad to know you'r idea . please help me . thank you. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiple floating objects | CKH | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | February 20, 2019 10:08 |
Plotting Radial Velocity and Tangential Velocity in CFD Post | ashtonJ | CFX | 5 | July 13, 2015 03:49 |
Results of CFX Simulations | Sof_70_Usthb | CFX | 3 | July 9, 2011 07:15 |
How do I use initial velocity by dynamic mesh method? | m_kanani | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 28, 2011 04:42 |
what the result is negatif pressure at inlet | chong chee nan | FLUENT | 0 | December 29, 2001 06:13 |