|
[Sponsors] |
September 9, 2003, 01:19 |
DG vs SUPG
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I need to solve convective dominated flows problem. If high order polynomial (chebyshev/Legendre) will be used as basis function, which is the best, Discontinuous Galekin (DG) or Streamline Upwind Petrov Galerkin (SUPG)?
|
|
September 12, 2003, 04:51 |
Re: DG vs SUPG
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Use Finite volume: SUPG is unbounded and DG unbelievably expensive (and from what I hear, the state-of-the-art is such that is still blows up in your face from time to time for things like mesh distortion).
|
|
September 15, 2003, 08:34 |
Re: DG vs SUPG
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What is the meaning of "unbounded" ? I hear that Finite Volume is the lowest order of DG method (the basis function is constant), is it true!
|
|
September 15, 2003, 09:22 |
Re: DG vs SUPG
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The constant in cell approximation in finite volumes is the lowest order approximation. Of course you can obtain higher order approximations by various reconstruction techniques. But what are the advantages of DG ?
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SUPG and DG (FEM) | peter | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 15, 2007 09:12 |
Problems with SUPG body force term | FEM question | Main CFD Forum | 0 | January 21, 2006 18:51 |
SUPG for 2-D Navier-Stokes advice needed.. | nicole | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 23, 2002 01:06 |
finite-volume version of SUPG | Bart Venneker | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 1, 2000 08:36 |