How best to set up a steady RANS problem that "should" be URANS?

LiveandLetDrive · April 16, 2009, 14:30

My group is simulating the airflow around an open-wheeled racing car and I am specifically focused on the wheels. This is a highly separated flow, especially behind the wheels. Due to computational limitations, most or all of our development will have to be done as steady simulations rather than using URANS with time steps. Is there anything that can be done to optimize the steady simulation (mesh, solutions settings, or otherwise?) to better approximate the appropriate URANS solution?

Thanks, any ideas appreciated.

vishyaroon · April 17, 2009, 17:12

It depends on what parameters you are looking at. If you are just interested in characteristics like flow, pressure etc then a steady state computation is good enough.

however if you want to look at noise or other turbulence related characteristics then you should go for an unsteady simulation.

LiveandLetDrive · April 17, 2009, 21:33

Primarily it is a problem of not being able to get good convergence using the steady assumption. Yes I am just needing flow and pressure (lift/drag) but I don't believe the numbers at this point and previous studies have shown unsteady simulation to be far superior. Without using unsteady is there anything I can do to optimize/make the best of a steady simulation?

April 16, 2009, 14:30	How best to set up a steady RANS problem that "should" be URANS?	#1
LiveandLetDrive New Member CSN Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 17	My group is simulating the airflow around an open-wheeled racing car and I am specifically focused on the wheels. This is a highly separated flow, especially behind the wheels. Due to computational limitations, most or all of our development will have to be done as steady simulations rather than using URANS with time steps. Is there anything that can be done to optimize the steady simulation (mesh, solutions settings, or otherwise?) to better approximate the appropriate URANS solution? Thanks, any ideas appreciated.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Problem with forming closed surface set	blip	Main CFD Forum	0	June 17, 2005 04:39
URANS / RANS???	FELIPE	Main CFD Forum	0	April 1, 2005 22:10
steady and unsteady Euler eq problem	AO	Main CFD Forum	3	January 27, 2004 17:29
Why does unsteady problem tend to be steady?	wang	Main CFD Forum	15	February 21, 2002 07:11
About the difference between steady and unsteady problems	Lisa	Main CFD Forum	11	July 5, 2000 15:37

April 17, 2009, 17:12		#2
vishyaroon Senior Member Aroon Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Racine WI Posts: 148 Rep Power: 17	It depends on what parameters you are looking at. If you are just interested in characteristics like flow, pressure etc then a steady state computation is good enough. however if you want to look at noise or other turbulence related characteristics then you should go for an unsteady simulation.

April 17, 2009, 21:33		#3
LiveandLetDrive New Member CSN Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 10 Rep Power: 17	Primarily it is a problem of not being able to get good convergence using the steady assumption. Yes I am just needing flow and pressure (lift/drag) but I don't believe the numbers at this point and previous studies have shown unsteady simulation to be far superior. Without using unsteady is there anything I can do to optimize/make the best of a steady simulation?