|
[Sponsors] |
March 24, 2009, 10:27 |
How does low Reynolds k-e model work?
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 |
I'm working on low Reynolds k-e model recently, but I found the model didn't work for 2d incompressible backstep benchmark( although it works very well for turbulence flate ), including Shih's realizable, Lam Bremhost, etc. I found it related to the damping funtion near walls, but I don't know how to limit the action range of the damping function.
Can anyone help me on this? Thanks a lot. |
|
March 24, 2009, 11:14 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 17 |
Have a look at the turbulence modeling by wilcox ? One option is to try a k-omega model by wilcox or davidson or menter. Another option would be to apply recent k-epsilon models. With Lam Bremost model the performance can depend on the boundary condition employed. With backward-facing step case, the definition of yplus for damping might be problematic and you might want to try y^+=y * sqrt(k)/nu
|
|
March 24, 2009, 12:30 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Hugo Ballesteros
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 |
Try to find some information about the SST model (Menter); is an hybrid between k-e and k-w models. In the particular case of backstep benchmark, some results show that this model predict very well the retouch point in the wall. good luck
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/SST_k-omega_model http://www.ansys.com/assets/tech-briefs/cfx-sst.pdf |
|
March 25, 2009, 09:50 |
|
#4 |
New Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 17 |
Thanks a lot.
I have tried SST and get good result, and I am testing the k-e model now. I find it may be related with y+, but I think y+ not good, and I find Shih get good result with his realizable model(better than SST), but I found it not so good, hehe. Maybe this is CFD. Maybe nonlinear model may work. |
|
March 25, 2009, 10:34 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
N/A
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 17 |
The problem with RANS modeling is you do not have THE model for any applications. The constants and damping for the models are computed from benchmark problems and they may or may not work for other cases. The non linear models may help in resolving the anisotropy of the Re stress tensor but not may not know better results for other parameters.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 18 | March 3, 2015 06:36 |
Low Reynolds Number k-epsilon formulation CFX 10.0 | Chris | CFX | 4 | December 8, 2009 00:51 |
How to activate low reyonds k-e model in CFX10.0? | Li | CFX | 0 | October 1, 2007 09:31 |
Turbulence Models for very low Reynolds Numbers | Sudhi | CFX | 1 | March 2, 2007 19:03 |
k-epsilon model, low Reynolds number formulation | Märta-Karin | CFX | 1 | September 15, 2003 22:37 |