|
[Sponsors] |
time steps in transient heat transfer in solids |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 5, 2003, 05:04 |
time steps in transient heat transfer in solids
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
Is there any criteria for the time steps doing transient calculation with heat transfer in solids? I found one for the convective mass transport saying 2*dt*nu/rho < L^2 L ... mean mesh size dt ... time step rho ... density nu ... dynamic viscosity Is that criteria correct? Is it possible to compare the energy-equation with the one for mass transport, so that I get a similar criteria for heat transport in solids?: 2*dt*lambda/(rho*cp) < L^2 L ... mean mesh size dt ... time step rho ... desnity lambda ... heat conduct. of solid cp ... spec. heat Thanks in advance for every answer Mike |
|
June 5, 2003, 05:58 |
Re: time steps in transient heat transfer in solid
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
It depends on whether you use an explicit or implicit method for time discretization. Usually: Explicit: 2*dt*lambda/(rho*cp) < L^2 (as you have pointed out) Implicit: No restrictions for convergence (only for accuracy) Semi-implicit (Crank-Nicolson): No retrictions for convergence but a restriction to avoid unphysical results: dt*lambda/(rho*cp) < L^2 Hope this helps, Gorka |
|
June 5, 2003, 06:30 |
Re: time steps in transient heat transfer in solid
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
Thank you very much - that really helps a lot, Gorka. I have an implicit scheme, so it should be only a question of accuracy. Do you have any advice how I can measure or see accuracy without having experimental data? Or is there any hint how to choose the time steps in fully imclicit scheme? Mike |
|
June 5, 2003, 06:47 |
Re: time steps in transient heat transfer in solid
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
The Implicit scheme is first order accurate unless you use results from the two previous time-steps (n and n-1, being n+1 the new time step, in which you evaluate the terms). Therefore, you should use small time steps if you want to obtain accurate results. Sorry but I donīt know any specific criterium. Gorka |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Domain Imbalance | HMR | CFX | 5 | October 10, 2016 06:57 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |
Transient Conjugate Heat Transfer | Raja | FLUENT | 2 | September 30, 2008 02:59 |
transient conjugate heat transfer problem | scott | Siemens | 2 | March 12, 2007 15:10 |
time averaged heat transfer in oscillating flow | Matthieu Ubas | Main CFD Forum | 2 | November 5, 1999 15:20 |