|
[Sponsors] |
Help!explicit multistage scheme with upwind scheme |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 1, 2003, 11:39 |
Help!explicit multistage scheme with upwind scheme
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I want to use explicit multistage scheme with upwind sheme(Roe+MUSCL) to solve the NS equation with turbulent model. But I found the implicit with upwind scheme is usually adopted in the literature. I want to know whether my approach is compatible. Could any one recommend the work in this field?
|
|
June 4, 2003, 04:42 |
Re: Help!explicit multistage scheme with upwind sc
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Both implicit and explicit can work theoreticaly. Since turbulence model is present, Linearization of flux Jacobi in implicit scheme presents some cumbersome derivation. Also, the inexact linerization for upwind scheme will slow down the convergence. I will prefer to use multistage RK method, but implement implicit treatment of pure diffusive terms. This enables code robust even at high Re.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
Use of upwind scheme for interpolation of u/v | quarkz | Main CFD Forum | 6 | August 30, 2011 05:10 |
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! | Far | CFX | 9 | May 31, 2011 09:21 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 02:50 |
Drag comparison upwind vs. scheme | Luk_Fiz | CFX | 3 | April 27, 2009 22:42 |