|
[Sponsors] |
April 2, 2003, 00:24 |
time accuracy test
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I know of a method which uses the decaying vortex to check for time and space accuracy for a scheme simulating incompressible Navier Stokes equations in primitive variable form. But according to my level of knowledge, this method can test time accuracy only on implicit methods, since explicit methods call for time steps relatively smaller than grid sizes, it cannot be used to test for time accuracy. May I know if there is any other way to test for time accuracy? Basically I am using a projection method on the semi-implicit 2nd order Crank-Nicolson time discretization. Thank you. Regards, Nat |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving mesh | Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom) | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 122 | June 15, 2014 07:20 |
Orifice Plate with a fully developed flow - Problems with convergence | jonmec | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 28, 2011 06:24 |
Computational time | sunnysun | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 5 | March 16, 2009 04:32 |
Time accuracy of NITA - FRACTIONAL STEP in Fluent | Paolo Lampitella | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 19, 2008 08:20 |
AMG versus ICCG | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 2 | November 7, 2006 16:15 |