|
[Sponsors] |
March 17, 2003, 08:18 |
Opinion on Powerflow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Let's have some lively debate in CFD:-
I'd like to post the following statement:- Powerflow is rubbish Could you please give your opinion on this. |
|
March 17, 2003, 09:20 |
Re: Opinion on Powerflow
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I hardly think you're going to get any sensible debate by staying anonymous, whilst slagging off a product.
How about: Hi, I work for ABC doing XYZ. I use a commercial product (called Powerflow) that I don't like for the following reasons.... |
|
March 17, 2003, 09:51 |
Re: Opinion on Powerflow
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can I check that Powerflow is the Lattice Boltzman method marketed by Exa? (www.exa.com prints the following in my browser "Ir4dex g0t Ya! bY MENDIGO" which, I guess, is the downside of the internet).
Quite a few years ago now I saw some decent predictions for the flow over ground vehicles which were superior to equivalent RANS predictions (although probably about equivalent to decent LES predictions). EXA was not forthcoming about how they were simulating near wall effects which may be OK in (some) industries running the package as a black box but is substantial problem in a research environment. I dropped my interest but a couple of months ago someone here working with Lattice Boltzman methods (different flavour to EXAs) said they were now helpful and informative about their methods. Given adequate resolution, I would be curious about how powerflow would perform poorly. Can you, briefly, describe the problems you have studied and what went wrong? |
|
March 18, 2003, 21:03 |
Re: Opinion on Powerflow
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi, did you get the singular results in PowerFlow that is what I guess.
|
|
March 19, 2003, 08:20 |
Re: Opinion on Powerflow
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
1. Your posting is rubbish.
2. Have a look at the ICASE Report 2000-40 : D. P. Lockard, L.-S. Luo, and B. A. Singer, Evaluation of the lattice-Boltzmann equation solver PowerFLOW for aerodynamic applications 3. My personal experience is, that the support from EXA is very bad (I only know it for Europe, maybe its better is the US). I know that BMW is using Powerflow (of course not very extensively) and they are satisfied with the results (whatever satisfied should mean in this context). IMHO the main problem of Powerflow are the RAM and computing requirements. Resumee : Good idea, bad marketing, ????? product. F&S |
|
April 15, 2003, 19:37 |
Re: Opinion on Powerflow
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm studying mechanical eng. I'm looking for a SIMPLE method example . would u like please send me an ex. with it's source code?
thanks |
|
April 17, 2003, 06:18 |
Re: Opinion on Powerflow
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear ahmad
People burn lots of body fuel to build up bunch of source codes like SIMPLE method. In the same way you have to make source codes yourself. I dont think you will get source codes from somewhere else except your supervisor! You can ask for some helps from people where you faced problems. Can you get source codes from STAR-CD, FLUENT ect!! You can't. Manosh |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who is actually using Powerflow? | Anders | Main CFD Forum | 9 | December 28, 2010 10:18 |
PowerFlow users - I have a few questions | paulh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 1, 2006 14:00 |
Is powerflow dead or still alive ? | john | Main CFD Forum | 11 | July 1, 2003 10:10 |
Any experience of PowerFlow from Exa | Jen | Main CFD Forum | 8 | April 4, 2003 19:13 |
powerflow | arvind ramachandra | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 16, 2001 16:39 |