|
[Sponsors] |
January 15, 2003, 19:46 |
k-e equation in in cartesian coords
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I'm trying to expand the k-epsilon equations from cartesian tensor notation to cartesian coordinates to form a system of equations for finite element analysis. Both the k- and e-equations contain a term with the Reynolds stresses expressed as follows: ( @Ui/@Xj + @Uj/@Xi ) ( @Ui/@Xj) Does this represent a scalar quantity (ie the scalar product of the two tensors), or a 3x3 matrix product in 3D? Thanks in advance, -CS |
|
January 15, 2003, 22:45 |
Re: k-e equation in in cartesian coords
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Any term in k and e equations is scalar because k and e themselves are scalars.
|
|
January 20, 2003, 09:45 |
Re: k-e equation in in cartesian coords
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What you are looking at is part of the production term in k and eps-equation, which are - yes a scalar. However in order to compute the production term you need to cycle through i and j indices from 1 to 3, hence the expression becomes something like:
P_k=\nu_t((dU/dy+dV/dx)dU/dy+(dU/dz+dW/dx)dU/dz+.... /Jonas |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out | saii | CFX | 12 | March 19, 2018 06:21 |
Calculation of the Governing Equations | Mihail | CFX | 7 | September 7, 2014 07:27 |
Constant velocity of the material | Sas | CFX | 15 | July 13, 2010 09:56 |
Viscosity and the Energy Equation | Rich | Main CFD Forum | 0 | December 16, 2009 15:01 |
Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue | Miguel Baritto | CFX | 4 | August 31, 2006 13:02 |