|
[Sponsors] |
January 2, 2003, 15:43 |
For turbulent boundary layer
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Since a even order central differential scheme has a huge numerical dissipation to the calculation of turbulence boundary layer, it is very difficult to hold the U_tau and turbulent statistical qualities. Structures are decay very fast in my LES simulations, dynamic modeling + LUSGS scheme used on that.
My question is that, Does anyone encounter it before? Do you have some suggestions to the numerical dissipation? |
|
January 2, 2003, 23:45 |
Re: For turbulent boundary layer
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As far as I know, 2nd order central difference scheme can work fairly well in LES if the desired order of the statistical quantities is not too high ( say 2nd order).
Maybe your mesh is not fine enough, or try employing a wall model in your simulation. regards |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Gmsh] Default Faces on Boundary Layer | axel | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 8 | February 17, 2011 08:47 |
Adapt mesh without modifying boundary layer cells? | Freeman | FLUENT | 0 | February 22, 2009 15:11 |
3D Boundary Layer | Mario | FLUENT | 0 | February 17, 2009 04:40 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 05:15 |
boundary layer thickness | 98.4F | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 29, 2000 08:23 |