|
[Sponsors] |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
At present I am implementing the standard universal Log law into a research CFD code. The question is " is the slip velocity imposed purely as a tangential component to the boundary or is there still a normal velocity component?" Cheers Stephen
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
can u explain what u mean to say
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'll try to explain my question again:
Taking a flat plate as an example with x being in the streamwise direction and y is normal to the plate. Is the Slip Velocity i.e. u+ imposed on the element adjacent to the boundary, purely in the x direction or does it have y compentant as well? The turbulence model being used is KE model. And Wall function is the Standard unverisal log law. My knowledge tells me that it should only be implied in the x direction, but Iam just seeking reasurance. If this still doesn't make sence I will try again. Cheers Stephen |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two-sided Wall Heat Transfer BC - No Separate Solid Mesh and No Heat Transfer Coeff | swahono | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 10 | October 15, 2018 06:43 |
UDF to Access Wall Normal Concentration Gradient | Daniel Tanner | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 4 | February 18, 2015 15:35 |
Tomiyama wall lubrication force | Edy | OpenFOAM | 10 | December 13, 2010 12:41 |
Wall functions | tutlhino | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 0 | July 2, 2007 06:04 |
Deal with wall boundary with moving mesh by FVM? | aiya | Main CFD Forum | 6 | May 10, 2007 12:33 |