|
[Sponsors] |
September 25, 2002, 12:57 |
Wall layer models
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everybody. I have a doubt regarding wall layer models. I have always used the standard wall functions, and to let the model work properly the near wall cell size has to be set in order to have the resulting y+ value between 30 and 100. In engine transient simulations this is not possible, because the flow conditions varies a lot, so it is difficult to keep the y+ value at the same location within the prescribed values. Furthermore, there are time instants where the velocity is almost zero, so y+ goes to 0, but there is no boundary layer because the fluid itself is standing!! So I´m always in doubt when I have to set up the near wall cell size: what is a reasonable range of values of y+ that should I obtain?
In other words, are the wall functions model suitable for transient simulations? And what about separation? Thank you in advance. Any help is welcome Roadracer |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[snappyHexMesh] Boundary layer in a pipe | Clementhuon | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | March 12, 2012 13:41 |
Wall coordinates and boundary layer thickness | bentmol | Main CFD Forum | 1 | July 3, 2011 21:44 |
Combining BCs: wall - outlet. Boundary layer disappears | MartinaF | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | July 20, 2009 19:14 |
Multicomponent fluid | Andrea | CFX | 2 | October 11, 2004 06:12 |
Wall functions or low-Re models? | J. P. | Main CFD Forum | 7 | July 9, 1998 12:11 |