|
[Sponsors] |
July 19, 2002, 06:05 |
CFL number and time accuracy for LES
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
I am now doing LES using SIMPLE based solver. I use the Crank-Nicolson scheme in time and the central difference scheme in space. I would like to use the fully implicit scheme in time as well. My questions are: (1) Which scheme would allow me to use a larger CFL number and how large a CFL number you normally used? (2) How do I know my solution is time accurate ? Thank you very much in advance. Li |
|
July 28, 2002, 03:47 |
Re: CFL number and time accuracy for LES
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
hello,i finished the code of les program with fortran,and i use implicit scheme,but when cfl is 1.22,the convergent rate is very small,could you help me?thanks
|
|
August 1, 2002, 07:11 |
Re: CFL number and time accuracy for LES
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
for implicit schemes any CFL can lead you to convergence .Cfl nos up to 20 has been used.but the accuracy of solution goes down as CFL no. increases.For time accuracy u can also use jameson's method of false time stepping.
but if the samllest time scale of the flow as given by kolmogorov scales is less , the it becomes a restricting factor and convergence can be affected. hope this helps Adarsh |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Multiple floating objects | CKH | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 14 | February 20, 2019 10:08 |
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end | xiuying | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 8 | August 27, 2013 16:33 |
Upgraded from Karmic Koala 9.10 to Lucid Lynx10.04.3 | bookie56 | OpenFOAM Installation | 8 | August 13, 2011 05:03 |
Unaligned accesses on IA64 | andre | OpenFOAM | 5 | June 23, 2008 11:37 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |