|
[Sponsors] |
July 4, 2002, 03:25 |
No serious CFD progresses?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have left CFD field for almost ten years. I still see many dicussions in this forum on some topics that have already been solved ten years ago. It seems to me there are no serious advances in CFD.
|
|
July 4, 2002, 06:56 |
Re: No serious CFD progresses?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Maybe you should refer to the so many research papers for the advances in the CFD, rather than by browsing this forum.
|
|
July 4, 2002, 11:30 |
Re: No serious CFD progresses?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I would have said that the introduction and use of scalable, massively parallel solvers is good progress.
|
|
July 5, 2002, 09:09 |
Solve the N-S equations and win a cool million!
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The mathematical solution of the N-S equations is one of the 7 problems these guys award $1,000,000 for...
http://www.claymath.org/prizeproblems/navierstokes.htm Anyone up for it? |
|
July 8, 2002, 03:55 |
Re: No serious CFD progresses?
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Mmm, that may be true from an academic or research point of view, but practically speaking, CFD is very useful and usable now. I call that a lot of progress.
|
|
July 8, 2002, 22:49 |
Re: No serious CFD progresses?
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Why are we bothering to respond to some anonymous person's subjective opinions!
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ASME CFD Symposium - Call for Papers | Chris Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | September 25, 2001 10:17 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 21:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
Since Last June | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 12, 1999 09:38 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |