|
[Sponsors] |
May 15, 2002, 09:52 |
Compare different Turbulent models
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I tried to find out the same geometry but different turbulent model (standard k-epsilon, RNG k-epsilon with low Reynolds number models), how can I compare the results got? Is there any standard procedure to follow?
|
|
May 16, 2002, 12:10 |
Re: Compare different Turbulent models
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Compare them on a case with experimental data that is close to yours. Here's an example of how to do it: http://www.daat.com/papers/ke-sec.html
|
|
May 22, 2002, 06:31 |
Re: Compare different Turbulent models
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
We've done a detailed comparison of EV turbulnece models for few benchmark flows. You can see the following references for the detailed methodology
1. Apsley D.D. and Leschziner M.A., 1999,'Advanced turbulence modelling of separated flow in a diffuser', Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 63, 81-112. 2. Hasan R.G.M. and McGuirk J.J., 2001, 'Assessment of turbulence model performance for transonic flow over an axisymmetric bump', Aeronautical J., 105 (1043), 17-31. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Laminar doesn't converge; Turbulent models do? | Amit | FLUENT | 11 | April 23, 2015 23:55 |
Two-equation turbulent models: low re airfoils | truffaldino | Main CFD Forum | 51 | March 19, 2012 19:57 |
Is this understanding of turbulence models correct? | 3kha | Main CFD Forum | 3 | January 31, 2011 22:31 |
Different turbulent models for the same material | John | Siemens | 1 | May 2, 2007 04:25 |
Laminar vs. Turbulent Models | Dahvid Brown | FLUENT | 3 | October 23, 2000 03:36 |