|
[Sponsors] |
May 14, 2002, 13:54 |
Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear friends:
I'm working on a nearshore Boussinesq wave model. Currently I have a problem with numerical stability for some cases. In order to damp out small scale noises, I want to use biharmonic damping term with an artificial viscosity given in light of Smagorinsky (1963) and (1993). While I'm trying to implement it on a curvilinear coordinate, can anyone point me to a reference of biharmonic term calculation in general coordinates? Since it appears to me that the biharmonic operator \nabla^4 in non-orthogornal coordinates is quite complicated. Thanks, Wen |
|
May 14, 2002, 16:48 |
Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you introduce a biharmonic operator, you are changing the order of the PDEs. You would need additional boundary conditions.
If the biharmonic term is merely an artifact that the numerical equations need, please make sure that the term zeros out near the boundaries. The Smagorinsky viscosity (I guess you are refering to the LES model) does not (and does need to) go to zero at the boundaries. You may find the discrete biharmonic operator on general coordinates in papers involving transonic flow solvers. |
|
May 15, 2002, 00:39 |
Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Kalyan:
Thank you very much. I wasn't aware that I'll have to zero out the viscosity near boundaries. That could be hard if my domain has arbitrarily shaped islands in side. Yes my biharmonic damping will be only artificial part. Many people do Smagorinsky closure in LES and Large Scale Ocean Turbulence, but papers I got are too concise to gain much out of them. You mentioned transonic flow solvers, can you point it to me more clearly? I'll try to find sth in my lib. Thanks again, Wen |
|
May 15, 2002, 06:50 |
Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
-coef *( Q_{i-2}-4 Q_{i-1} +6 Q_i +4 Q_{i+1} +Q_{i+2}) for equal sized grid. But coef is quite empirical.
|
|
May 15, 2002, 06:54 |
Re: Biharmonic Viscosity with Smagorinsky model
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sorry , there should be "-" before "4".
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Herschel-Bulkley non-Newtonian viscosity model has term with sign error | pbryant | OpenFOAM Bugs | 5 | June 19, 2013 00:53 |
Water subcooled boiling | Attesz | CFX | 7 | January 5, 2013 04:32 |
Hyper viscosity model | Pascal_doran | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 2 | December 1, 2010 20:51 |
Questions about Cross-WLF viscosity model in interHeatFoam | awacs | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 1 | October 21, 2009 03:10 |
Smagorinsky Sub-grid Model | Craig Johansen | CFX | 1 | October 13, 2004 04:10 |