|
[Sponsors] |
April 16, 2002, 04:32 |
calculation method for 3D flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am trying to compute 3D flow (Navies-Stoke eq.). But I don't know which method is better, explicit method or implicit method?
Also, what's kind of calculation algorithm of implicit method is popular and suitable, can anyone kindly give me a hint? I do need your help. Thank you very much! |
|
April 16, 2002, 09:56 |
Re: calculation method for 3D flow
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Well, this is a quite large question. Please decide whether your case is incompressible or compressible. For the former one, SIMPLE series methods are very popular. For the later one, especially when the Mach number is larger, time-marching method is recommended.
Besides, may be you should think about the accuracy you wish. Then, you have choices among Reynolds averaged equations methods, Large Eddy Simulation method and also Direct Numerical Simulation method. Concerning the explicit and implicit method, it depends on the algorithm you use. For the SIMPLE method, implicit method is popular. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
compressible flow calculation error using rhoSimpleFoam solver | student4326 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | November 2, 2015 12:34 |
Axissymmetric "laminar flow?" -> Calculation of Cd | Rahul Sangole | FLUENT | 3 | January 30, 2006 03:31 |
Multiphase Flow with Chorin's Projection Method | Stefan Leschka | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 20, 2002 16:46 |
CFD method for High Re flow | Toshiyuki Arima | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 29, 2001 12:18 |
Flow visualization vs. Calculated flow patterns | Francisco Saldarriaga | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 3, 1999 00:18 |