|
[Sponsors] |
January 31, 2002, 16:46 |
grid refinement in turbulent flow
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi CFD-cats,
What might be a good rule of tumb for grid refinement near walls in turbulent room flows (combined convection), modelled with RANS models? Of course a first restriction is y+>11 for high Re formulations. However, I found that predictions are quite different if I compare grids with 50<y+<100 and 200<y+<300. Any comments? Cheers, pepe |
|
February 1, 2002, 11:17 |
Re: grid refinement in turbulent flow
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello Pepe,
This is a known problems when wall functions are used. It is not possible to get mesh independent solutions when you use wall functions. The so called y+ is a function of the mesh. For disretized form of the equations to be consistent with the governing equations, we need to get mesh independent solutions. This is the one big reason why it is recommended to use turbulence models without wall functions whenever possible. Thanks, Thomas |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
On grid independent solution for pulsatile flow | David | FLUENT | 5 | March 25, 2022 04:33 |
Laminar flow or Turbulent flow | mech | FLUENT | 0 | January 27, 2007 19:51 |
laminar and turbulent flow in one simulation | msna | FLUENT | 0 | January 27, 2007 18:35 |
modelling laminar and turbulent flow in the same | Ol | FLUENT | 2 | November 25, 2005 03:52 |
Grid Independent Solution | Chuck Leakeas | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 26, 2000 12:18 |