|
[Sponsors] |
January 10, 2002, 14:25 |
FEM vs FDM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Can we use FEMs for flow analysis?
|
|
January 10, 2002, 16:38 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes.
|
|
January 10, 2002, 18:23 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Discontinuites, like shocks, are hard to describe. And, don't expect any speed up compared to FDM. FEM is as slow as FDM.
Pascale |
|
January 10, 2002, 22:18 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
There are many existing commercial codes which use FEM as their discretization. It will tend to be slower as mentioned in another response but literature shows it to be more accurate, requiring less grid points then FDM or FEM. Links between a FEA solver and CFD solver can be made with the finite element technique. It will probably be the way some day.
|
|
January 11, 2002, 01:40 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear all,
How about with FVM ? I think it is more stable solution compared with FDM. But, what's your comment ? |
|
January 16, 2002, 17:31 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
if it's an old FEM software, I guess it can't solve convetion dominating flow problems very well, because of stability issue.
but in fluid mechanics, todays' finite element kind methods are much better than FDM |
|
January 16, 2002, 17:48 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
all FEM, FDM, FVM, and spectral element methods are special forms of weighted residue methods. none of them are better method for every problems. by logic, FV must have disadvantages. it's stable due to it's local control of conservation, which is obviously better than global control; it treats complex gemotry much better than FD, which has to use boundary fitted coordinates or transformation to another space(computational space). so, FV is a general-purposed method. so why still FD?
I guess, for many problems, FV lacks accuracy. FD could converge much faster than both FV and FE for many problems. Spectral element converges even faster, however, in each step it costs more time to do integration( I guess) something like that. also, FD is the easiest method to implement. BEM(boundary element) is the fastest method. so, I'll say, if a problem can be solved using FD or BE gracefully, then use them; otherwise, consider the other three methods. |
|
January 17, 2002, 09:11 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Look at the book edited by 33. Wendt, J.F., (1996), "Computational Fluid Dynamics An Introduction", Springer. or the paper by Idelsohn, S.R., Oņate, E., (1994), "Finite Volumes and Finite Elements: Two 'Good Friends'", Int. J. num. Meth. Eng., Vol. 37, pp. 3323-3341. for a comparison. the advantage of FVM is that it is easy and fast to compute, and mass conservative (something more difficult to achieve with FEM I believe).
|
|
January 18, 2002, 19:13 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
||
January 21, 2002, 03:04 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think those method (FEM, FDM and FVM) has disadvantage and advantage. No method has not disadvantages. Ok
|
|
January 27, 2002, 11:42 |
Re: FEM vs FDM
|
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
now is FVM , one fdm method
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
openfoam -> fem, fvm, fdm? | tH3f0rC3 | OpenFOAM | 4 | September 3, 2015 03:51 |
FDM vs FVM vs FEM in CFD analysis | ck5285 | FLOW-3D | 1 | September 1, 2009 11:51 |
FEM vs FDM | Alf | Main CFD Forum | 5 | October 28, 2005 15:03 |
Atleast 5 general Diffrences between FVM, FEM, FDM | RAJ | FLUENT | 2 | October 7, 2005 09:25 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 19:28 |