|
[Sponsors] |
December 10, 2001, 16:47 |
Should I use preconditioning ?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello all,
Can anyone tell me if I can use a compressible flow solver using Roe scheme to simulate a low speed flow of Mach number around 0.01 or lower without preconditioning ? Regards Vajra |
|
December 12, 2001, 06:23 |
Re: Should I use preconditioning ?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes. The fact that the compressible flow does not depend on Mach number if Mach is close to zero. I think you will get the nearly same solutions for M=0.2...0.1 (in dimensionless form)
Alexey |
|
December 12, 2001, 06:39 |
Re: Should I use preconditioning ?
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks Alexey,
Could you tell me where I could find out some papers dealing with such kind of preconditioning ? Vajra |
|
December 12, 2001, 13:03 |
Re: Should I use preconditioning ?
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That would be impractical. The system becomes stiff when the Mach number tends to zero. Preconditioning is probably the best way to overcome the stiffness. A simple form of preconditioning could be Chorin's artificial compressibility method which would not require extensive changes to the code. The reference is:
Chorin, A. J., A numerical method for solving incompressible viscous flow problems, J. Computational Physics, vol 2, pp. 12-26, 1967. If your problem has important boundary layer effects then you might need more complicated preconditioning approaches, check the work of Merkle C. L. cheers, chidu... |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Roe implement about preconditioning | ricklee | Main CFD Forum | 7 | July 7, 2006 07:14 |
Re: Preconditioning for moving grids | ganesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 6, 2006 07:18 |
Preconditioning in 3D | ganesh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 28, 2006 07:39 |
implementing preconditioning | clifford bradford | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 19, 2000 17:03 |
local preconditioning | Manish Jaiman | Main CFD Forum | 3 | May 1, 2000 09:31 |