CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Dynamic Subgrid Models

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 27, 2001, 15:27
Default Dynamic Subgrid Models
  #1
Bono
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Has anyone experience on the dynamic Smagorinsky and dynamic Mix models for compressible flows. How many times slower are they compared to laminar NS (without model). I have coded them with 2nd order central scheme and Runge-Kutta time-stepping using Top Hat filter with trapezoidal integration rule and found 2.5 and 4 times slower, respectively. I use single processor Origin2000 on uniform grid 33x33x32 points. I need some benchmarks. Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2001, 17:26
Default Re: Dynamic Subgrid Models
  #2
kalyan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The percentage computational overhead that the dynamic filtering procedure adds depends on the numerical scheme you use to integrate the basic NS equations and also (perhaps more importantly) your implementation of this scheme.

If you are using an explicit time stepping procedure, should you be able to do some FLOP counting to compute the overhead due to dynamic filtering. If the dynamic procedure is slowing you code down by more than 2.5 times, you must have a very fast integration scheme.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 27, 2001, 17:50
Default Re: Dynamic Subgrid Models
  #3
Bono
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for your comment, but I really need an actual number of how slower the dynamic Smagorinsky and Mix compared to no-model people commonly encounter in compressible flows. I ll feel really bad if my code's performance is far below the others. As I heard that for the incompressible version the slow down factor is below 1 for the dynamic Smagorinsky, but that's probably because the basic NS needs to solve pressure Poisson's equation which bring down the slow down factor. As I mentioned, I use 4 steps Runge-Kutta for the time integration of the basic NS and the filter is uniform (cheap, grid independent). Anybody did real a posteriory calculations?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LES Dynamic models details lakeat OpenFOAM Programming & Development 10 May 19, 2011 08:46
A bug in using dynamic LES models arslantuf OpenFOAM Bugs 6 December 8, 2009 17:34
how to do in dynamic subgrid sgs les model? aiya Main CFD Forum 2 September 15, 2006 02:45
Dynamic Mesh Models Marc Main CFD Forum 1 November 29, 2003 13:21
subgrid models V. G. Ferreira Main CFD Forum 9 November 5, 2001 15:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01.