|
[Sponsors] |
November 8, 2001, 08:21 |
Trends of CFD
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
What are the main trends of CFD ?
|
|
November 8, 2001, 08:31 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
In terms of research or in terms of industrial use?
|
|
November 8, 2001, 08:36 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Both areas
|
|
November 8, 2001, 10:19 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
That's a pretty wide question, too wide to get a good answer I'm afraid. Anyway, here are a few key-words from my point of view (industrial CFD user with a research background in CFD):
|
|
November 8, 2001, 11:12 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Jonas,
Thank you. It is really insightful. But what is CGNS ? Regards, Li Yang |
|
November 8, 2001, 11:15 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It is a new standard format for storing CFD data - the standard is being pushed mainly by ICEM, Boeing and NASA. Most larger CFD code vendors have announced that they will support it (Fluent, Star-CD, CFX, Numeca ...)
You can find more info about CGNS on http://www.cgns.org |
|
November 8, 2001, 13:19 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Boeing has announced that 30,000 jobs will be cut. ICEM was acquired by Ansys last year. Do you still think that CFD is booming? Automation reduces the number of jobs. You didn't mention that CFD is using expert system to design airfoil so the airfoil designers are no longer needed. |
|
November 8, 2001, 14:28 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The commercial CFD market is growing by 20% annually - this is a fact and not a guess.
Before Sept 11. there was a huge lack of aerospace engineers (at least in Europe, where I live). I am working with turbomachinery blade-design myself and I can assure you that I don't feel at all worried about loosing my job to an expert system. Traffic at CFD Online reached an all-time-high in October, with more than 450,000 read web-pages. One year ago the traffic was about 300,000 read web-pages per month. I don't think that Ansys bought ICEM because they think that CFD is not important, on the countrary I think that Ansys sees CFD as a very important area for the future, and an area where they need to strengthen their expertise. I wouldn't be surpriced if Ansys also bought a CFD-code company soon. Yes I still think that CFD is booming. |
|
November 9, 2001, 02:01 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#9 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
The job cuts at Boeing are mostly non-tecnical and at Seattle only. That is what I heard from a Boeing recruiter who came to my University. They are still actively recruiting a lot of engineers and cfd specialists. As Jonas mentioned lot of research in CFD is now in the areas of chemical mixing analysis and two phase flows. So CFD is still Booming in my opinion.
Anindya |
|
November 9, 2001, 03:10 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#10 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ansys cooperated with powerflow ? What's with this ?
I heard, cfx should be sold What about a combination of ansys and cfx ? or: Ansys + starcd ? but developement of star depends too much on universities; not the very commercial way of ansys in the last year.. or: Ansys and tascflow ? Only turbomachinery..Is there enough potential with vibrating turbomachinery-components ? perhaps noise... or ansys and fluent ? fluent is also "very commercial", wide spread, much potential, fluent also wants (!?) to become the leader in turbomachinery with the new gambit-turbo. |
|
November 9, 2001, 04:33 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#11 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Dear Mr. Larsson :
Thank you very much for your wonderful remark! |
|
November 10, 2001, 21:21 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#12 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
cfd is used to solve PDEs for fluid problems numerically. let's say that we wake up one day and find that these PDEs have been solved analytically, what would happen to cfd?
|
|
November 11, 2001, 13:19 |
Re: Trends of CFD
|
#13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It would become really useful in the design process.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFD Wiki - We Need More Help | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 13 | September 13, 2005 18:36 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 22:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 05:49 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 13, 1999 00:27 |
public CFD Code development | Heinz Wilkening | Main CFD Forum | 38 | March 5, 1999 12:44 |