|
[Sponsors] |
August 31, 2001, 06:44 |
Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I am very much new to these things so please excuse my ignorance. Background: I need to solve the unsteady Stokes equations in a liquid bridge between two spheres. Assuming axisymmetry and fore-aft symmetry this leaves a domain with two flat sides (the centrelines), one side that is the arc of a circle, and one side that is a curved free surface, intersecting the circular arc with a contact angle that can be small (almost 0). Note that all boundaries are stationary. The basic question: is it possible to obtain a grid that will allow me to solve the equations using the F.D. method despite the fairly acute corner of the domain? Sorry to waffle, thanks. Rob |
|
August 31, 2001, 12:48 |
Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
As Finite Difference requires structured grid, the Transfinite Interpolation (TFI) Method of Grid generation may be employed for this problem. For important corner points, clustering around that corner would be suitable.
|
|
September 1, 2001, 14:36 |
Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
(1). Why not take a look at Joe Thompson's book "Numerical Grid Generation", available free on Internet, with Fortran codes attached including various schemes.
|
|
September 3, 2001, 08:58 |
Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks to everyone for their replies. Does anyone out their know of any textbooks that address the problem of sharp corners in domains, and/or anything good on finite volume methods?
|
|
September 3, 2001, 10:01 |
Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Robin:
The FV method can accomodate any kinds of grid. Therefore, it's suitable for complex geometries. The grid defines only the Control Volume(CV) boundaries, and need not be related to a coordinate systems. If CVs boundary is the same as the surface integrals which represent convective n' diffusive fluxes, the F.V. method is conservative. Disadvantages of F.V. method: FV requires two levels of approximation: interpolation n' integration, difficult to develop in 3D (Ref: Book " Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics", J.H.Ferziger). Hope this helps. Peter |
|
September 3, 2001, 10:03 |
Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
what's the hyperlink for this book, John?
Many thanx. peter |
|
September 3, 2001, 10:08 |
Re: Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Numerical Grid Generation by Thompson, Warsi and Mastin is available at
http://www.erc.msstate.edu/education/gridbook/ |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
elliptic grid generation (orthogonal) | vasu | Main CFD Forum | 8 | October 28, 2015 16:20 |
air bubble is disappear increasing time using vof | xujjun | CFX | 9 | June 9, 2009 08:59 |
Convective Heat Transfer - Heat Exchanger | Mark | CFX | 6 | November 15, 2004 16:55 |
Grid Generation Help | George | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 4, 2003 14:08 |
Latest news in mesh generation | Robert Schneiders | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 2, 1999 05:07 |