|
[Sponsors] |
March 16, 2001, 04:11 |
Nose singularity of blunt body grids
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello,
when generating grids for symmetric blunt bodies (one block) a singularity is imposed at the nosetip. My question is if there is a way to get rid off this singularity or simplify somehow the treatment of this single point in the code. Thanks for your help. |
|
March 16, 2001, 08:01 |
Re: Nose singularity of blunt body grids
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Ah, this can be a bit of a problem. Here's how I've seen it done before.
Just use your normal grid format ( I assume you're using 3-D structured grids ). For the grid cells at the singularity, they will have one side collapsed to a line, in effect a five-sided rather than a six-sided cell. The trick is to still treat it as a normal six-sided cell, don't bother treating it as a special case. Just make sure that when you are calculating the area of this (collapsed) face you get a zero value, then ensure that this results in a zero flux contribution across that face. This may be a bit tricky if you have a viscous scheme but if you stick to the principle you should be ok : don't invent special treatments, just make sure your normal treatment does the right thing when it finds a zero cell area. It's hard to be more specific since different codes work out fluxes in different ways. I hope that helps. |
|
March 19, 2001, 11:18 |
Re: Nose singularity of blunt body grids
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Numerical Solution of the Blunt Body in Supersonic Flow Problem | andres17 | Main CFD Forum | 19 | April 26, 2016 16:29 |
IcoFoam parallel woes | msrinath80 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 9 | July 22, 2007 03:58 |
Could anybody help me see this error and give help | liugx212 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | January 4, 2006 19:07 |
Need Body Fitted Grids | CFDtoy | Main CFD Forum | 0 | July 14, 2004 21:40 |
Grid singularity in blunt body simulations | Stefan | Main CFD Forum | 8 | August 4, 2001 23:33 |