|
[Sponsors] |
January 24, 2001, 14:23 |
flow over a 2D cyl using SIMPLE
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi everyone
Although the original SIMPLE formulation was through finite volume, I believe that the SIMPLE algo can also be used for a finite diff. formulation provided the equations used are in the conservation form, which are derived by considering a fixed infinitesimal fluid volume in space. I would like to know what the important considerations are while using a finite diff. formulation for SIMPLE and also if a non conservation form of equations can be used. Say for e.g. if I were attempting to solve the incompressible flow over a 2D cylinder using a polar grid using SIMPLE, would I have to consider the conservation form of the transformed N-S equations? Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Many tanks in advance. |
|
January 27, 2001, 08:32 |
Re: flow over a 2D cyl using SIMPLE
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
1.For this particular problem you need not use the transformed equations.You can solve it premitive variables it self. You say u r using finite difference scheme Simple will work . Just Discretise the N.S ( premitive variables will do)and try it out.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
blasius flow simulation using SIMPLE method | sizyef | Main CFD Forum | 1 | December 18, 2011 11:49 |
Ask help wiht a SIMPLE Method on compressible flow. | universez | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 8, 2010 11:38 |
two flow heat tranfer in the simple heater | flow1025 | FLOW-3D | 1 | December 31, 2009 20:45 |
Strange Solution for a simple pipe flow!! | shekharc | Main CFD Forum | 4 | May 9, 2005 10:21 |
SIMPLE method for 2-D flow | N.Natiq | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 2, 2001 09:26 |