|
[Sponsors] |
November 3, 1998, 10:54 |
second order FD upwind scheme
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I was ask by a friend, I had a hard time to answer, so I give the nswer to all of you. Is there a simple higher order upwind scheme for FD which* also works for non equidistant meshes? Thank you very much! Ciao Heinz |
|
November 3, 1998, 15:25 |
Re: second order FD upwind scheme
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It depends on what do you consider simple. I am using SMART ( a kind of QUICK with limiters) and it works well. The good way to introduce it is using deferred correction (more robust, easy to converge). Here you have an interesting reference:
Darwish M.S. and F. Mokalled (1996), The normalizad weighting factor method: a novel technique for accelerating the convergence od high-resolution convective schemes, Num. Heat Transfer B 30, 217-237 In the paper few high order numerical schemes are explained (also for non uniform grids). You can also find there a deferred correction vs direct introduction of the whole convection term.Even in the paper the authors showed that the direct way is better, I have bad experiences calculating benchmark cases (driven caviity, differentialy heated cavity), so I am using deferred correction. Hope this is enough, if not ask more. Alex |
|
November 3, 1998, 15:33 |
Re: second order FD upwind scheme
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
It depends on what do you consider simple. I am using SMART (a kind of QUICK with limiters, anyhow it is better to use limiters in second order schemes - no unphysical oscillations) and it works well. The good way to introduce it is using deferred correction (more robust, easy to converge). Here you have an interesting reference:
Darwish M.S. and F. Mokalled (1996), The normalizad weighting factor method: a novel technique for accelerating the convergence od high-resolution convective schemes, Num. Heat Transfer B 30, 217-237 In the paper few high order numerical schemes are explained (also for non uniform grids). You can also find there a deferred correction vs direct introduction of the whole convection term.Even in the paper the authors showed that the direct way is better, I have bad experiences calculating benchmark cases (driven caviity, differentialy heated cavity), so I am using deferred correction. Hope this is enough, if not ask more. Alex |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2nd order upwind and QUICK scheme | Wiroon | Main CFD Forum | 19 | September 17, 2019 04:47 |
2nd order upwind vs 2nd order upwind!!! | Far | Main CFD Forum | 7 | March 14, 2013 13:29 |
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!! | Far | CFX | 9 | May 31, 2011 09:21 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 02:50 |
Quasi Second Order Upwind (QSOU) Scheme | Orco | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 20, 2007 12:07 |