|
[Sponsors] |
December 12, 2000, 10:20 |
RNG k-epsilon model
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I have some problems to interpret some results of turbulent simulations with the rng-kepsilon model. I am using a turbulence model to solve the influence of the walls (in Fluent this is called Two Layer Zonal Model) which deals with a one equation turbulence model of Wolfstein. ANyway my problem is that I have a huge over-prediction of pressure drop for my flow (water, incompressible, steady state assumed, no heat transfer) through a welleded geometry. The only explanation I have is that there are some laminar parts in my flow which make the solution with the RNG-kepsilon model inaccurate??
ANy ideas Thanks in advance Phil |
|
December 12, 2000, 15:15 |
Re: RNG k-epsilon model
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
(1). The description is too vague for me to know what you are doing. (2). If you can't explain the problem clearly, you are likely a new user or newcomer to CFD. (3). If you are using Fluent, you can post the message at the Fluent forum, where the code experts can have a chance to answer it.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to use K-ε RNG turbulence model | AirWolf | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | October 20, 2009 07:23 |
RNG k-epsilon viscous model | abaqus213 | Main CFD Forum | 1 | May 20, 2009 00:11 |
RNG K-epsilon turbulence model | romed | Main CFD Forum | 2 | June 7, 2007 10:49 |
HELP!! Prandtl numbers in RNG k-e turbulence model | maoasis | FLUENT | 0 | April 24, 2006 11:51 |
RNG k-epsilon model and wall function | greg | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 30, 2000 16:27 |