|
[Sponsors] |
October 26, 1998, 09:11 |
LES in FEM
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hello there,
has anybody of you made experience about a LES-simulation with the FEM method? obviously the advantages of this discretization method (flexibility in representation of the flow domain) implies problems when concerning the computational effort. anyway, i would be happy to hear some suggestions and probabbly some recommended techniques to reduce the expenses. thanks very much. |
|
October 29, 1998, 23:55 |
Re: LES in FEM
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi ..
Look for the work by keneth jansen (center for turbulence research , stanford ... annual research briefs 1994,1995 and 1997) Another group is Chalot and Ducros in France ( AIAA 94-0814 by CHalot et al) hope that is of some use mayank |
|
November 9, 1998, 12:04 |
Re: LES in FEM
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
FEM is known to work very well in elliptic problems where diffusion is much bigger than convection. For turbulent flows the convective terms are very important and classical Galerkin FEM are not suited to treat them. You must then use upwinding methods. Kenneth Jansen from the Rensselaer faculty has worked a lot on this topic and you can find his articles on his web page. I am also working on the use of finite element (with and without upwinding) in LES but I am still in a development phase and I don't have enough results to tell you if FEM seems to be a viable way or not in LES. Therefore I am interested in any information you 'll find on this subject. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I developed an FEM toolkit in Java: FuturEye | nkliuyueming | Main CFD Forum | 7 | January 29, 2016 14:28 |
Turbulence dampening due to magnetic field in LES and RAS | eelcovv | OpenFOAM | 0 | June 8, 2010 12:35 |
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM | kenn | Main CFD Forum | 2 | July 18, 2004 19:28 |
LES on two phase flow | Li Yang | Main CFD Forum | 0 | May 12, 2004 09:10 |
Some Questions about LES. | Bin Li | Main CFD Forum | 2 | February 20, 2004 10:58 |