|
[Sponsors] |
September 14, 2000, 23:41 |
High-order scheme and grid
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I am coding a Linear Stability Analysis for fluid dynamic problem, and therefore a genernalized eigenvale problem A x=lamda B x must be solved. The dimension of A and B is (4xNJxNK)^2.(NJ and NK is number of grid in y and z direction). Due to the limitaion of memory, NJxNK can only be up to 30x30, but it seems too coarse for my calcutation.
My quesation is (1) If a higher-order difference scheme (e.g. 4-order)is adopted in stead of my present 2-order scheme, the problem caused by coarse grid can be remedied? (2) I remeber that a paper mentioned that a non-homgious grid would reduce the accurate of high-order scheme. I read it several years ago, and can not find it again now. What is your suggestion on a homgious or non-homgious grid? (3) Could you suggests a good high order difference scheme to me with corresponding literature? Your advises and suggestions on any above questions are highly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Zeng |
|
September 15, 2000, 19:05 |
Re: High-order scheme and grid
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
Check out the following publication: http://landau.mae.missouri.edu/~vasi...high-order.pdf Sincerely, Frederic Felten |
|
September 16, 2000, 07:48 |
Re: High-order scheme and grid
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
It is a good idea to use a spectral type discretization if you are really limited by a coarse grid. This will give you much better results if your focus is to obtain very accurate eigenvalues. With finite-difference you can use arbitrarily higher-order approximations which is obviously limited by the number of grid points you have. There is a paper in the SIAM Journal which gives an algorithm to generate coefficients for arbitrary order of accuracy finite-difference scheme. The author escapes my memory, I will look it up and repost. chidu... |
|
September 17, 2000, 21:32 |
Re: High-order scheme and grid
|
#4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thanks you all for your kind help.
Chidu mentioned paper seems very interesting, we wish you can find it. zeng |
|
September 18, 2000, 07:25 |
Re: High-order scheme and grid
|
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Chidu & Zeng
You may look up Fornberg's paper "Generation of Finite-Difference Formulas on arbitrarily spaced grids", Math. Comp. V51, N0184, p699, 1988 Ravichandran |
|
September 18, 2000, 11:12 |
Re: High-order scheme and grid
|
#6 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Exactly, Ravi. This is the paper. I was on vacation and did not have access to the info. Thanks.
regards, chidu... |
|
October 14, 2000, 14:10 |
Re: High-order scheme and grid
|
#7 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
please guide me for using higher order scheme for les
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oscillations in Results and Residuals | Freeman | FLUENT | 27 | December 18, 2010 14:09 |
Compact scheme for nonuniform grid? | Dong | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 2, 2008 00:44 |
Higher order discretization on staggered grid | Chandra Shekhar | Main CFD Forum | 9 | January 27, 2005 17:31 |
Upwind Converged while Higher Resolution Not! | Sherry Clark | CFX | 4 | October 21, 2004 00:27 |
2nd order boundary condition for QUICK scheme | Jafarnia | Main CFD Forum | 0 | February 25, 2004 10:03 |