CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

I need help about dpm coupled to an Eulerian wall film

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 9, 2024, 01:45
Default I need help about dpm coupled to an Eulerian wall film
  #1
New Member
 
zygao
Join Date: Jul 2024
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 2
zoey gao is on a distinguished road
I am using a discrete phase model coupled to an Eulerian wall film model to solve for the liquid film thickness at the wall. Why does the water film show a granular distribution in the cloud map
zoey gao is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 9, 2024, 05:12
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Martin_Sz's Avatar
 
Marcin
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Poland, Swiebodzin
Posts: 313
Rep Power: 13
Martin_Sz is on a distinguished road
There are a few possible reasons why your cloud map might be showing a granular distribution for the water film thickness when using a coupled DPM-EWF model:

1. **Particle Size Discretization:** In the DPM, you likely define a range of particle sizes to represent the water droplets. This discretization can lead to a blocky or granular appearance in the cloud map, especially if the range is large or the number of size classes is small.

2. **Limited Resolution:** Cloud maps often have a limited number of cells to represent the solution space. If the water film is thin or the cloud map resolution is coarse, you might see a patchy or granular distribution instead of a smooth film.

3. **Turbulent Fluctuations:** If you're simulating a turbulent flow, the water film thickness may fluctuate due to the turbulent eddies. These fluctuations can be captured by the DPM and reflected as a granular distribution in the cloud map.

4. **Model Convergence Issues:** If the DPM-EWF model hasn't fully converged, the solution might be unstable and show inconsistencies like a granular film.

Here are some steps you can take to address these potential causes:

* **Refine Particle Size Distribution:** Try reducing the range of particle sizes in the DPM or increasing the number of size classes. This will provide a more accurate representation of the water droplet size distribution and potentially lead to a smoother film in the cloud map.
* **Increase Cloud Map Resolution:** If possible, increase the number of cells in your cloud map to capture the variations in film thickness more accurately. This will allow for a smoother representation of the film.
* **Reduce Turbulence Intensity (if applicable):** If the granular distribution is due to turbulent fluctuations, consider reducing the turbulence intensity in your simulation (if the physics allows it) to see if the film becomes smoother.
* **Ensure Model Convergence:** Double-check your convergence criteria and run the simulation for a longer time to ensure the solution has fully converged. An unconverged solution can lead to various inconsistencies in the results.

By investigating these factors and making adjustments to your model setup, you should be able to achieve a smoother representation of the water film thickness in your cloud map.
__________________
Quick Tips and Tricks, Tutorials FLuent/ CFX (CFD)
https://howtooansys.blogspot.com/
Martin_Sz is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Droplets in Centrifugal Fan - Particle Tracking - Wall Film ClemensK CFX 6 June 17, 2024 18:58
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 05:38
Eulerian wall film model with DPM dan86 FLUENT 5 June 13, 2016 03:26
How to monitor Eulerian Wall Film Convergence Jeeloong FLUENT 0 October 26, 2015 10:42
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 03:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:27.