|
[Sponsors] |
November 17, 2023, 23:12 |
Y+ confusion
|
#1 |
New Member
Gabriel
Join Date: Nov 2023
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 2 |
Dear Sir/Madam,
I had been simulating flow over OneraM6 wing at transonic regime. The y+ value for komega SST is preferably 1, for K epsilon should be 30<y+<300. Currently I have used Spalart Allmaras because of doing validation. Now I have heard that Spalart Allmaras is insensitive to y+ value, so the mesh layer height will get automatically adjusted (correct me if I am wrong). The boundary layer thickness is nearly 0.0170, so have put this distance in the mesh size of 1st cell. This again to be taken into account, for viscous sublayer y+ is below 5 and more than 30 for logarithmic. (No idea is range of 300 can be considered here or not) I ran the simulation, the plots for Cp, M, velocity are understandable. Now If I plot the y+ over surface (from additional data file quantities in Ansys CFD post), there is wide variation of y+ over wing surface. Legend shows from 0.2 to 500. I am attaching a picture below. Kindly explain how to interpret this plot and why is y+ value more than 300, around 500 for Spalart Allmaras model. If this contour is incorrect, then why other contours of pressure and velocity parameters are near about matching the values of validation data? Regards Gabreeal |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Confusion Regarding Inlet Boundary Condition for Detonation Simulation | niyas | Main CFD Forum | 3 | March 9, 2023 02:40 |
Confusion in calculation of u', the velocity flucation | ckpark | Main CFD Forum | 13 | March 21, 2022 08:40 |
some confusion about "bool" | warnerchang | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 11 | April 17, 2021 11:30 |
Confusion choosing between static / transient simulations | TharunSK | CFX | 1 | March 15, 2019 18:53 |
some confusion about the radiation model of Floefd | jason kid | FloEFD, FloWorks & FloTHERM | 4 | March 3, 2016 08:13 |