 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
July 3, 2023, 23:20
|
Multi-Phase vs Lagrangian Particle Tracking
|
#1 |
|
Member
Song Young Ik
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: South Korea
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 4  |
As what I understood, multiphase method deals problem as fraction of fluids(or solid, in case of particle) inside single cell, while LPT calculates movement of every single particle. Is it correct?
Also, I saw some result according to someone that if fraction of particle increase to some 10~20%, then multiphase method actually works better than LPT. If it is about calculation speed, it would be so but is it even case of accuracy too? What would be the line of fraction where each method starts to become more accurate? |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Tags |
| lagrange particle, multiphase |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LES or DES turbulence modeling with Lagrangian particle tracking | Robertsmj29@gmail.com | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | July 25, 2022 10:17 |
| Lagrangian particle tracking cannot be run in parallel for the cases with AMI patches | Armin.Sh | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 7 | March 28, 2021 23:33 |
| Ubuntu 12.10 + openfoam2.2.0 ==> paraview error message | peteryuan | OpenFOAM Installation | 6 | August 18, 2013 19:00 |
| solver stop problem in Lagrangian Particle Tracking | sakurabogoda | CFX | 3 | October 5, 2012 07:09 |
| Check particle impaction with User Fortran | Julian K. | CFX | 3 | January 12, 2012 10:46 |
Linear Mode
