|
[Sponsors] |
CFD problem regarding simulating the steam cracking furnace |
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I need some urgent help . I have been simulating the steam cracking furnace from certain papers namely
1.) CFD simulations of steam cracking furnaces using detailed combustion mechanisms 2.) Impact of radiation models in CFD simulations of steam cracking furnaces. In both these papers furnace geometry, reaction, composition of the fuel and the models applied are similar. But in both these papers , the maximum flame temperature was achieved at the height of 1.5m . But when I try to simulate these papers using the same flow , combustion , turbulence model in the ANSYS fluent , same as that of the papers my maximum flame temperature reaches at 2.1 m and has a longer flame when compared to those above paper. Can someone please help me why this is happening even though I have applied the same case as that of papers |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
fluent - parallel, simulation |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cfd simulation of ethanol steam reforming for marine stirling engine | Avr.Tomer | Main CFD Forum | 0 | April 13, 2020 17:12 |
SU2-7.0.1 on ubuntu 18.04 | hyunko | SU2 Installation | 7 | March 16, 2020 04:37 |
Is that practically possible analyze furnace via CFD? | litzj | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 27, 2018 05:52 |
Alternatives to Ansys CFX for steam turbines CFD analysis. | S_teph_2000 | Main CFD Forum | 7 | June 28, 2018 15:05 |
CFD - Trends and Perspectives | Jonas Larsson | Main CFD Forum | 16 | August 7, 1998 16:27 |