|
[Sponsors] |
December 9, 2022, 15:10 |
Wall functions for y+ < 1
|
#1 |
New Member
Yicong
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hi guys,
I'm trying to run an LES Smagorinsky simulation where my average y+ is 0.74 and my max y+ is 2. These are low y+ values, so I've read that I don't need a wall function. Is there any reason why I shouldn't use a wall function (nutUSpaldingWallFunction for example), since it gives me accurate results anyway? |
|
December 10, 2022, 05:34 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
|
I don't remember the details for OF wall functions but, if a wall function is an all y+ one then, for low y+ values it just behaves as if it was off.
For the static Smagorinsky model, you should also check that OF has some damping function near walls for the turbulent viscosity, as it is known to produce the wrong near wall behavior. These aspects could or not actually be relevant for your case depending from how important the wall turbulence production is in the overall flow mechanism at play. This, in addition to the discretizazion, of course. |
|
Tags |
low y+, wall functions |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ansys CFD-Post Application Error | rushiCFD | FLUENT | 0 | March 21, 2021 08:51 |
Table bounds warnings at: END OF TIME STEP | CFXer | CFX | 4 | July 17, 2020 00:44 |
Wall functions - questions about implementation | AlmostSurelyRob | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 44 | May 6, 2020 11:11 |
wall functions implementation | besh | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | January 1, 2013 10:14 |
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent | romekr | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | November 26, 2011 13:11 |