 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
[Sponsors] | ||||
Wind turbine single blade, extra MRF zone required? |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 28, 2022, 13:17
|
Wind turbine single blade, extra MRF zone required?
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 13  |
Hello,
I am facing the simulation of a wind turbine blade. Single blade with 120° rotational periodic domain. I have seen 2 ways of simulating it: -On the first one, a MRF zone has been set around the blade that is connected to the bigger domain (no MRF) with an interface. -On the other case, a single big domain has been done, all set as MRF. Which one would be the correct approach and why? I see the advantage of having no interface, but I am not sure whether setting the whole domain as MRF can have some drawback. Thank you very much in advance. Kind regards. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| meshing 3d, meshing advice, wind turbine |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AutoGrid - Meshing wind turbine blade | Ko_Shine | Fidelity CFD | 6 | November 7, 2024 13:47 |
| Wind turbine blade gradient-based constrained optimisation | JanFoam | SU2 | 2 | January 19, 2021 09:40 |
| [BladeModeler] Geometry and Meshing for Failure Analysis of Wind turbine blade | Wajeeh | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | December 30, 2020 06:17 |
| Problem in conducting CFD of analysis of wind turbine blade | atulpat | CFX | 16 | August 17, 2013 05:09 |
| [Other] ANSYS CFX-Meshing problem of a wind turbine blade | Zoe | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 1 | July 14, 2010 03:02 |
Linear Mode
