CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Forced Transition (transition point imposition) in unstructured CFD solvers

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   June 23, 2021, 06:05
Default Forced Transition (transition point imposition) in unstructured CFD solvers
  #1
New Member
 
Gaetano
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 8
Gaetano03 is on a distinguished road
Hello everyone,


I am facing the problem of addressing laminar to turbulent transition for compressible high-reynolds number flows. From my initial literature review, it seems that performance of Local correlation transition models (the easier option if 3D complex configurations are considered) quickly deteriorates as Reynolds number goes beyond 5-6 million, and eN based approaches become more reliable even if crucial limitations for this method still remain for complex 3D flows.


I was testing the performance deterioration of the Bas-Cakmakcioglu model in SU2 as Re number goes beyond 5m.


I was therefore thinking to address the problem of imposing transition a-priori through an intermittency factor, which is a given rather than calculated through local quantities as in the BC model. I was wondering if there are renference or anyone can give any help if this is possible at all and how it can be implemented in an unstructured solver like SU2.

Of course, different ideas and/or references on how to define forced transition in an unstructured CFD solver are welcome.


I am mainly looking at using SA model for turbulence, but also SST is available in SU2.


Also please correct me if I am wrong about the current status of Local-Correlation Transition models for high reynolds numbers.



Thanks a lot,


Gaetano
Gaetano03 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The CoP Does not exist: Validating Aerodynamic forces through a "line of action" ds4719 Main CFD Forum 14 February 18, 2022 19:05
CFD Salary CFD Main CFD Forum 17 January 3, 2017 18:09
CFD Design...The CFD Future John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 20 November 20, 2015 00:40
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 13, 1999 00:27
Iterative equation solvers in CFD Vitaly Bulgakov Main CFD Forum 32 March 1, 1999 12:11


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:34.