|
[Sponsors] |
2nd-order TVD criteria for flux limiter methods |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
October 19, 2020, 17:22 |
2nd-order TVD criteria for flux limiter methods
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello, this is my first question here
I have a system of 1D nonlinear conservative hyperbolic equations which will form shocks after finite time. I'd like to evolve them via method-of lines (MOL) with a flux limiter for the high- and low-order spatial fluxes. Most sources simply state that to keep the overall method 2nd-order and TVD, the limiter function must lie in the region given by the attached image: I was able to derive the same conditions for the overall TVD region, but I do not understand where the blue region comes from. I have obtained a copy of the original paper by Sweby (1984) but it isn't clear to me at all. Also, his methods are based on Lax-Wendroff as a starting point. How can I be sure these conditions generalize to any choice of 2nd-order method, such as central difference? I was under the impression that you could pick and choose any purely spatial higher order scheme and apply the limiter in conjunction with 1st-order upwind. I have asked this question also on stackexchange without much luck, so for those who have an account there you can earn some rep by answering: http://https://scicomp.stackexchange...r-flux-limiter |
|
Tags |
flux limiter, hyperbolic balance laws, nonlinear equation, tvd; second order; shape |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Transition SST model - convergence problem with 2nd order discretization | xara | FLUENT | 4 | May 27, 2013 14:16 |
2nd order TVD scheme | Wenjun | Main CFD Forum | 8 | March 14, 2013 13:31 |
High order methods in commercial use? | cfdnewbie | Main CFD Forum | 5 | January 12, 2012 06:51 |
4th and 5th Order TVD Runge-Kutta Methods | saygin | Main CFD Forum | 2 | January 30, 2006 12:45 |
TVD | student | Main CFD Forum | 6 | September 9, 2002 10:19 |