CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Relative humidity higher than 100% evaporative cooling

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 18, 2019, 01:46
Default Relative humidity higher than 100% evaporative cooling
  #1
New Member
 
Javier Ruiz
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 14
jrrelx is on a distinguished road
Hi all.
I'm trying to simulate the pre-cooling of an air stream by means of evaporative cooling in Fluent. I intend to validate the CFD model with the results from the experiments I have conducted in a wind tunnel facility.

In my simulation, unsaturated air flows into the tunnel and is mixed with a an air stream carrying away small water droplets. As a result of the difference between the partial pressure of vapor at the interface and the vapor concentration in the bulk gas, water evaporates and the air temperature is reduced.

I'm using the DPM model along the k-epsilon turbulent model for the continuos phase. The thing is that for my low water mass flow rate injected experiments, the cases converge and the results match the physics of the problem (water droplets temperature reaching the inlet air wet-bulb temperature), humidity levels in the expected range (no greater than 100% in relative humidity) and temperature levels in fair agreement with the experimental data. However, for the high water mass flow rate injected experiments, the results of the simulations make no sense at all. The humidity levels increase above 100% and sometimes even the particle trajectories deviate from the expected path.

I was wondering if I was defining ok the physiscs of the problem. I understant that when droplet evaporation is activated in Fluent, the vaporization law is enabled and it uses the appropiate correlation to calculate the saturated vapor pressure, which is crucial to evaluate the evaporation since it's the driving force for the evaporation process. But having obtained realiable results with the same set-up, I no longer think that is related to it.
Instead, I've reading that there is a limitation when using the DPM model.

The second phase should be sufficiently dilute that particle-particle interactions and the effects of the particle volume fraction on the gas phase are negligible. That occurs for low volume fraction, usually less than 10-12%. In my simulations, the main aire stream volumetric flow rate is about 0.2 m3/s. At the injection section, I have 0.004 m3/s of air and 1.26e-6 m3/s of water (DPM). I don't think my cases are over that limit, but I can't see any reasons why the simulation is failing to converge.

The mixture of both humid air streams doesn't result in supersaturated conditions. I've attached some screenshots of the simulations that converged succesfully.

Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance for your time.

Cheers.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf results CFD.pdf (159.7 KB, 22 views)

Last edited by jrrelx; November 18, 2019 at 07:24.
jrrelx is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
evaporation of droplet, evaporative cooling


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[solidMechanics] Support thread for "Solid Mechanics Solvers added to OpenFOAM Extend" bigphil OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction 686 December 22, 2022 10:10
[solids4Foam] How to calculate drag coeff when using solids4Foam amuzeshi OpenFOAM CC Toolkits for Fluid-Structure Interaction 15 November 7, 2019 13:50
How to find relative humidity in evaporative cooling ? Nawal FLUENT 1 July 14, 2018 16:30
relative humidity and temperature by outlet Bing FLUENT 5 March 7, 2014 07:03
Relative humidity amar FLUENT 0 April 14, 2009 21:59


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55.