CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

higher order time and space discretisation for elliptic eq. with a transport eq.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   August 20, 2019, 16:45
Default higher order time and space discretisation for elliptic eq. with a transport eq.
  #1
New Member
 
Marko Josic
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 15
emjay is on a distinguished road
Hello community.

i'm thinking about time accurate discretisation.

I know the basics about Forward Euler / Backward Euler / Crank Nicolson / BDF / RK2 and higher order / DIRK etc and how expensive some of the schemes are.

Also about the concept of TVD.

If a solution contain a discontinuity and i need preserving monoticity the requirements for spatial and time discretisation must have TVD scheme. (e.g. Superbee for spatial and RK3-TVD for time)

But how is it if the equations are elliptic, (subsonic) or the system of Equations contain an additional transport equation (e.g. concentration C). Is it necessary that this equation have also a spatial TVD scheme?

IMHO if the mesh is not fine enough unphysical oszilations would appear in the transport equations.

The goal is a higher order discretisation of the equations in time and space to avoid unphysical solution.
emjay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 20, 2019, 16:50
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,830
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by emjay View Post
Hello community.

i'm thinking about time accurate discretisation.

I know the basics about Forward Euler / Backward Euler / Crank Nicolson / BDF / RK2 and higher order / DIRK etc and how expensive some of the schemes are.

Also about the concept of TVD.

If a solution contain a discontinuity and i need preserving monoticity the requirements for spatial and time discretisation must have TVD scheme. (e.g. Superbee for spatial and RK3-TVD for time)

But how is it if the equations are elliptic, (subsonic) or the system of Equations contain an additional transport equation (e.g. concentration C). Is it necessary that this equation have also a spatial TVD scheme?

IMHO if the mesh is not fine enough unphysical oszilations would appear in the transport equations.

The goal is a higher order discretisation of the equations in time and space to avoid unphysical solution.



- Provided that the BCs are regular, elliptic equations has a regular solution.

- The passive transport of a concentration C is like solving the Lagrangian equation for the particles having a constant concentration, therefore no new unphysical extrema must be generated. But the equation for such transport is hyperbolic and some flux limiter must be introduced.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
tvd rk higher order


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Run OpenFoam in 2 nodes of a cluster WhiteW OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 16 December 20, 2016 00:51
Numerical Weather Modelling : Time and space resolution issues chriswatt Main CFD Forum 0 February 15, 2011 21:32
Space and time discretization of Euler equation Hooman Main CFD Forum 2 June 6, 2010 08:30
Second order time accuracy Aditya Main CFD Forum 3 October 2, 2006 13:16
first order time, second order space sven CFX 1 October 27, 2005 13:05


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:51.