|
[Sponsors] |
Ho to justify that the problem is stiff in numerical study |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 11, 2019, 18:08 |
Ho to justify that the problem is stiff in numerical study
|
#1 |
New Member
Amir
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello all,
I'm solving a transient natural convection problem using finite-volume method and comparing it with another results with different approach. The problem is in order to recover their results I should do a lot of iterations (2000 ) in each time-step in FLUENT's fully implicit transient solver, otherwise, the transient solution comparison has a very large error (for example using 20 iterations instead of 2000 is very off) but the steady-state results have very small error. The problem is, in order to be able to iterate that much I should set equations residuals criteria as low as 10^-12. My conclusion is this problem is very stiff so the equation residuals are as low as 10^-12 but the variable residuals are 10^-3 I want to justify this idea so I need to prove why the problem is stiff, can you guys help me finding sources that justified a problem like this. or any past experience with situations like this that can ignite another idea? Thank you |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Grid independent study problem | wzhang11 | STAR-CCM+ | 5 | February 19, 2016 10:03 |
Numerical Scheme for a CFD problem | Saturn_V | Main CFD Forum | 8 | September 25, 2013 03:54 |
Numerical problem in buoyantBoussinesqPimpleFoam | vtcampos | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 2 | July 7, 2013 08:55 |
error problems between experimental and numerical study | d118i | Siemens | 4 | June 18, 2010 13:45 |
extremely simple problem... can you solve it properly? | Mikhail | Main CFD Forum | 40 | September 9, 1999 10:11 |