CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Question about characteristics and classification of second-order PDEs

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 28, 2018, 15:03
Question Question about characteristics and classification of second-order PDEs
  #1
Senior Member
 
Lee Strobel
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10
Time4Tea is on a distinguished road
Hi, I am currently reading the text book 'Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics', by C.A.J. Fletcher; however, I am confused about a section in Chapter 2 relating to classification and solving of second-order PDEs using the method of characteristics.


I have posted the details of the question here on the site Mathematics Stack Exchange, so I will not repeat the mathematical details in this post.


I posted the question almost two weeks ago and no-one there has yet provided an answer. I am just wondering if anyone on this forum can help shed some light on this, either by posting something here or directly on that site?


Thanks in advance!
Time4Tea is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2018, 15:17
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Time4Tea View Post
Hi, I am currently reading the text book 'Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics', by C.A.J. Fletcher; however, I am confused about a section in Chapter 2 relating to classification and solving of second-order PDEs using the method of characteristics.


I have posted the details of the question here on the site Mathematics Stack Exchange, so I will not repeat the mathematical details in this post.


I posted the question almost two weeks ago and no-one there has yet provided an answer. I am just wondering if anyone on this forum can help shed some light on this, either by posting something here or directly on that site?


Thanks in advance!

I never followed Fletcher in the classification, I largely prefer the wave solution technique described in the book of Hirsch.
However, I think that Eq.(4) is assumed to be satisfied if both terms in the LHS of Eq.(4) are zero
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2018, 18:30
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Lee Strobel
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 133
Rep Power: 10
Time4Tea is on a distinguished road
@FMDenaro: Thanks, I will try to get hold of a copy of that textbook, to see if I will understand the explanation there better.


I guess I can also just skip past that chapter in Fletcher and go on to the sections that deal more with the numerical methods. However, in general, I don't like skipping past sections of text books without understanding them. It seems to me that this chapter of the Fletcher book is a bit poorly-written, if it doesn't explain the material well enough to allow someone to answer the problems at the end. It's a bit of a pet peeve of mine, oh well ...
Time4Tea is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2018, 18:45
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
This topic is just of mathematical character, not necessarily linked to CFD so any good textbook on PDE can be used, too.

However, among many CFD textbooks you could find useful a reading to Chap.3 of Anderson
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 29, 2018, 11:59
Default
  #5
agd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 358
Rep Power: 19
agd is on a distinguished road
There is a better discussion in the book "Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer" by Anderson, Tannehill, and Pletcher that follows a similar development but is more clearly explained. The equation you note in the StackExchange post arises as the determinant of the matrix of coefficients that comes from the 3x3 system developed from the PDE and the two equations for the derivatives of p and q in terms of u, v, w, and the characteristic curve arc parameter tau. No mention is made of splitting the original equation.
agd is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2018, 08:02
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
Praveen. C
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 343
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 18
praveen is on a distinguished road
I like Whitham's definition of pde types. I dont have the book with me but I highly recommend looking it up. Hyperbolic equations have wave-like solutions. Parabolic equations have damped wave-like solutions.

We better understand canonical equations like

u_t = u_{xx} \qquad (parabolic)

u_{tt} = u_{xx} \qquad (hyperbolic)

u_{xx} + u_{yy} = 0 \qquad (elliptic)

If given a general second order PDE, then the different conditions on the coefficients in the PDE
B^2 - 4AC > 0, \quad \textrm{or} \quad = 0 \quad \textrm{or} \quad < 0
allow you to find a change of independent variables that tranforms the PDE into one of the above three canonical PDE. I find this view more useful for classification of pde.
praveen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 30, 2018, 13:56
Default
  #7
agd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 358
Rep Power: 19
agd is on a distinguished road
I would recommend Whitham's entire book "Linear and Non-linear Waves".
agd is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
mathematics, pde's higher order


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:40.