|
[Sponsors] |
Hypersonic Simulation Recommendation - CFD++ or OpenFOAM, or else? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 9, 2018, 11:29 |
Hypersonic Simulation Recommendation - CFD++ or OpenFOAM, or else?
|
#1 |
New Member
Deniz
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
Hello everyone,
I am going to work with hypersonic flow - on a nozzle design. I think I have the options to work with CFD++ and OpenFOAM, but still could not find a proper reason to pick one or another in terms of capability. I'd be glad if you could help with this, and maybe help with some starting references. Regards. |
|
May 9, 2018, 12:56 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 153
Rep Power: 8 |
Commercial application works smooth and your choice depends on the amount of money you wuold like to invest! For compressible flows and remaining into open-source world, SU2 from standford seems to be the best on the market.
|
|
Tags |
cfd analysis, cfd++, hypersonic flow, openfoam |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Centrifugal fan impeller CFD simulation in OpenFoam | ZachJa | OpenFOAM | 9 | June 15, 2024 12:03 |
Using CFD Post for OpenFoam results | Karpfen | OpenFOAM Post-Processing | 3 | January 19, 2018 09:48 |
OpenFOAM 4.0 Released | CFDFoundation | OpenFOAM Announcements from OpenFOAM Foundation | 2 | October 6, 2017 06:40 |
OpenFOAM Training Beijing 22-26 Aug 2016 | cfd.direct | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 0 | May 3, 2016 05:57 |
CFD Online Celebrates 20 Years Online | jola | Site News & Announcements | 22 | January 31, 2015 01:30 |