|
[Sponsors] |
Prandtl Mixing length Vs. Isotropic turbulent |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 24, 2000, 00:06 |
Prandtl Mixing length Vs. Isotropic turbulent
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi:
Prandtl Mixing length hypthesis recommends that: u' ~= v' ~= l*du/dy throughout the whole flow field. The condition u' ~= v' is the definition of isotropic at a point. Now the question is: How prandtle mixing length hypothesis, which is the basis for all the zero equation models, can justify the anisotropicicty of turbulent colse to the wall? Thanks for your comments. MJ |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to define the turbulence intensity and mixing length at an outlet (for k-eps)? | david39 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 6 | February 2, 2011 04:01 |
k-epsilon: Defining turbulent intensity and length scale? | klausb | OpenFOAM | 0 | January 23, 2011 08:28 |
how to calculate Turbulent Length Scale | nuimlabib | Main CFD Forum | 2 | August 18, 2009 05:22 |
Prandtl mixing length vs Isotropic assumption | Mohammad Kermani | Main CFD Forum | 1 | March 26, 2000 16:47 |