|
[Sponsors] |
Simplest way of converting a 2d Navier Stokes code to a 2d axisymmetric one |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 18, 2017, 15:41 |
Simplest way of converting a 2d Navier Stokes code to a 2d axisymmetric one
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello
I have a 2d NS code, I want to convert it to a 2d axisymmetric one, can you refer me to a reference, thesis, book, that describes the easiest way to do it? Btw, how do you suggest me to modify the 2d version to get a 2d axisymmetric one? Boundary conditions also to me is not clear whether or not, and how should be modified. Shall I change all my discretizations and convert them to cylindrical coordinate? |
|
September 18, 2017, 15:53 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73 |
Quote:
I don't see a relevant problem in doing that ...if you work in (r,z), the direction z is one of the 2D direction (x or y), depending on your choice. Just see in some textbook the PDE equations in (r,z) and discretize as you did in the 2D case. You will find some slight differences and you have to consider the r=0 case but it is quite simple, some years ago I transformed my 2D code in one day, validation included. |
||
Tags |
axisymmetric problem, navier stoke solver, two dimensional |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Very small job: converting an OpenFOAM mesh to a format needed by another code | SFr | CFD Freelancers | 1 | June 24, 2016 06:45 |
NAvier Stokes and Newton's law coupling | archeoptyrx | Main CFD Forum | 10 | March 6, 2014 03:42 |
how many BC's should be assigned physically in navier stokes runs? | immortality | Main CFD Forum | 13 | August 30, 2013 21:08 |
Adding a term to Navier Stokes Equation | ashtonJ | CFX | 3 | January 15, 2011 07:32 |
CFD code about axisymmetric bodies at hypersonic speeds | Afshin Azari | Main CFD Forum | 5 | October 26, 1998 18:09 |