|
[Sponsors] |
Recreating hydrodynamic cavitation paper's results at larger scale |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 11, 2017, 11:06 |
Recreating hydrodynamic cavitation paper's results at larger scale
|
#1 |
New Member
AJ
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 |
I am interested in creating hydrodynamic cavitation through a slit Venturi reactor. I have found this paper that models the CFD of circular and slit Venturis here: http://www.krishisanskriti.org/vol_i...0150106017.pdf
The conclusion is "Slit Venturi with slit of dimension 2mm height 3.14 mm depth operating at 8 atm gauge inlet pressure, slit height to length ratio of 1:1 and divergence angle of 5.5 degree are the optimized parameters for maximum cavitational activity." I'm wondering if these results scale up as I need a slit dimension of 2 cm not mm. How hard will modeling this caviation be to recreate? Will caviation still occur at the larger size and will the results in their conclusion still hold? I am inexperienced with CFD but these are questions I need to find the answer to. I am trying to create a CAD model and recreate in simFlow but it is a bit advanced for me at the moment so I've come to the internet for guidance. Thanks for reading. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
bad results for cavitation in interPhaseChangeFoam | wmg1368 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 0 | November 25, 2015 05:04 |
How to find a good time scale strategy? | StefanG | CFX | 19 | June 8, 2012 09:41 |
Centrifugal Pump Cavitation problem or not. | ismael.s | CFX | 13 | February 27, 2012 09:00 |
Papers where Exa Powerflow results are shown? | Anders | Main CFD Forum | 0 | June 6, 2006 17:52 |
Drag coefficients are larger than EXP results | victorzcc | FLUENT | 2 | September 24, 2005 12:22 |