|
[Sponsors] |
Getting incorrect u-velocity profile by solution |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 9, 2017, 10:49 |
Getting incorrect u-velocity profile by solution
|
#1 |
New Member
Dharma
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
Obtaining wrong u-velocity profiles. Velocity at all y increases in x-direction. Results below for laminar flow through rectangular microchannel (H=0.1 mm, W=0.2 mm, L=50 mm, Re=100, Inlet velocity=0.449 m/s). Wrote SIMPLER algorithm in Python code. Followed Versteeg and Malalasekra. Is is due to any error in p or u boundary condition?
0.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000 0.01670.44900.40040.41420.42670.43830.44900.45890.46820.47690.48540.49370.50200.5031 0.03330.44900.63190.65510.67510.69360.71080.72660.74130.75530.76880.78200.79560.7974 0.05000.44900.71100.73760.76000.78060.79970.81730.83380.84940.86450.87930.89400.8960 0.06670.44900.63540.65860.67850.69690.71380.72950.74410.75800.77150.78460.79750.7993 0.08330.44900.40170.41560.42810.43970.45030.46010.46930.47800.48650.49480.50280.5039 0.10000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.00000.0000 |
|
September 9, 2017, 19:42 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15 |
Without more information, it looks like you are applying your velocity profile boundary condition on your bottom wall (see the 0.1 in the line of 0.0).
|
|
September 9, 2017, 21:57 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Dharma
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 9 |
I am sorry. I forgot to remove the first column. It represents the distance in y-direction (vertical direction) from y=0 to y=0.1 (height of the rectangular channel). The second column onwards - the velocities at different distances from inlet in x-direction (flow direction).
But the pressure computed from this code is matching with standard value for laminar tube flow. Pressure drop obtained from the present analysis = 21.85 kPa Pressure drop calculated from Fanning's equation = 23.90 kPa I wrote code for steady state SIMPLER algorithm. I am giving below the profile after removing the first column. Sorry for the inconvenience, and thank you very much. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.4490 0.4004 0.4142 0.4267 0.4383 0.4490 0.4589 0.4682 0.4769 0.4854 0.4937 0.5020 0.5031 0.4490 0.6319 0.6551 0.6751 0.6936 0.7108 0.7266 0.7413 0.7553 0.7688 0.7820 0.7956 0.7974 0.4490 0.7110 0.7376 0.7600 0.7806 0.7997 0.8173 0.8338 0.8494 0.8645 0.8793 0.8940 0.8960 0.4490 0.6354 0.6586 0.6785 0.6969 0.7138 0.7295 0.7441 0.7580 0.7715 0.7846 0.7975 0.7993 0.4490 0.4017 0.4156 0.4281 0.4397 0.4503 0.4601 0.4693 0.4780 0.4865 0.4948 0.5028 0.5039 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Last edited by Dharma Vedula; September 9, 2017 at 23:32. |
|
September 12, 2017, 03:35 |
|
#4 | |
Senior Member
Lane Carasik
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 692
Rep Power: 15 |
Quote:
|
||
Tags |
boundary condition p, boundary condition u, simpler algorithm, simpler code |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
atmBoundaryLayerInletVelocity - Velocity Profile not continuous through domain | sdfij6354 | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 3 | July 26, 2017 17:16 |
UDF error - parabolic velocity profile - 3D turbine | Zaqie | Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming | 9 | June 25, 2016 20:08 |
How to apply an outlet velocity profile to another inlet? | siw | FLUENT | 4 | April 10, 2013 12:19 |
unable to get parabolic velocity profile with pimplefoam | houkensjtu | OpenFOAM | 4 | October 8, 2012 05:41 |
Variables Definition in CFX Solver 5.6 | R P | CFX | 2 | October 26, 2004 03:13 |