|
[Sponsors] |
How to calculate Taylor series expansion of a cell based on cell averaged derivatives |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 17, 2017, 05:38 |
How to calculate Taylor series expansion of a cell based on cell averaged derivatives
|
#1 |
New Member
Manish Kumar Nayak
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 |
I have been trying real hard to understand but still, I don't know how do we expand a polynomial in a Discontinuous Galerkin cell based on cell averaged derivatives.
Here is the link to the below paper: http://dept.ku.edu/~cfdku/papers/AIAA-2009-605.pdf Also, the reference of this reference paper http://people.math.gatech.edu/~yingj...ll_new_iii.pdf Section 4.1 I have posted the same question here too: https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/qu...-derivatives-i Please help me understand this. I have spent hours on the same page now. |
|
April 17, 2017, 06:27 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73 |
I am not sure about your question ...do you want to express a link between the point-wise function f(x) and its averaged function fbar(x) by means of a Tayolor series?
|
|
April 17, 2017, 06:39 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Manish Kumar Nayak
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 |
No, it's not really that. It's like if you have 11 nodes, i.e. a representation of 10th order polynomial in a domain, you want to write the 10th order polynomial in terms of the average of its derivatives. eg.
P(x) = avg_domain(P(x)) + avg_domain(dP/dx) * (x-x0) + avg_domain(d2P/dx2) *( (x-x0)^2 - h^2/12)) .. I don't know how exactly this expansion is derived and those averages of derivatives are calculated. This has been taken from the papers I have posted. Eq. 28 in 1st paper and section 4.1 in 2nd. |
|
April 17, 2017, 07:01 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73 |
Taylor and lagrangian polynomials are related ...
However, from Eq.(28) I also have doubts about the expression....As I wrote before, it expresses a link between the point-wise function and the average function and its derivatives. Reading the paper, I suppose that first one starts in terms of the classical expansion f(csi)=f(x0) + df/dx|x0 (csi-x0)+d2f/dx^2|x0 (csi-x0)^2/2+... that is integrated over a general volume so that fbar(x) = 1/h Int[x-h1/2,x+h2/2] f(csi) dcsi getting f_bar(x) = f(x0) + df/dx|x0 [1/h Int[x-h1/2,x+h2/2] (csi-x0) dcsi]+ .... Now, the authors wrote that: "First the original degree p solution polynomial within a “troubled cell” is replaced with an equivalent polynomial based on the cell-averaged derivatives up to degree p. Then the high-order derivatives are hierarchically limited using the cell-averaged derivatives of one degree lower. " so I suppose they introduce an approximation by substituting the point-wise derivatives with the averaged derivatives... Maybe in Ref[23] the procedure is bettere detailed.. |
|
April 17, 2017, 07:09 |
|
#5 |
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,882
Rep Power: 73 |
Have also a look to ENO/WENO reconstruction schemes, for example in the book of Leveque.
|
|
April 17, 2017, 07:10 |
|
#6 |
New Member
Manish Kumar Nayak
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 11 |
Yes, I did read that {Ref 23} but I couldn't figure out the algorithm they used. Could you please give it a read?
Is the book Leveque finite difference methods? |
|
Tags |
cell centroid, galerkin |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DPM Cell Averaged Velocity of particles | pxc3536 | FLUENT | 1 | March 10, 2014 04:47 |
Vertex based v.s. Cell center based FVM on resolving boundary layer separation | Anna Tian | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 21, 2013 07:20 |
[ANSYS Meshing] need to convert a cell based geometry into STL or CGNS | kamran_kibria | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 0 | September 15, 2011 06:14 |
Diff b/w node based & cell based methd | Murthy | FLUENT | 0 | April 2, 2008 14:18 |
node based or cell centered Ts values | acboge | FLUENT | 0 | February 6, 2004 07:41 |