|
[Sponsors] |
Limiting the production of turbulent kinitec energy |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
March 20, 2017, 02:20 |
Limiting the production of turbulent kinitec energy
|
#1 |
New Member
New South Wales
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi all,
I am looking to best model vortices formed by a delta winged aircraft for an AoA range of -5 to 25 degrees using a steady state solver. I have attached an excerpt of an AIAA paper I was reading (Integration of Multi-Fidelity methods for Generating an Aerodynamic Model for Flight Simulation), where they state: "It is well known that most linear 2-equation turbulence models over-predict the eddy viscosity within vortex cores, thus causing too much diffusion of vorticity". The referenced articles are: Gordnier, R. E. “Computational study of a turbulent delta-wing flowfield using two-equation turbulence models”. AIAA 96-2076, 1996. and a link to the second is: http://reports.nlr.nl/xmlui/bitstrea...pdf?sequence=1 These both discuss the usage of a limiting term in the standard k-e and k-w models. I was wondering if anybody has any input on this topic or found this necessary when using either the realisable k-e or the SST k-w for similar simulations to mine. Cheers. Last edited by tbwake; March 20, 2017 at 02:52. Reason: Add info |
|
March 20, 2017, 07:18 |
|
#2 |
Member
Tarang
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Delhi, India
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 15 |
Hi,
I am also facing the similar problem my k-epsilon model, where I found I am over predicting the Production term and I followed "Turbulent Flows" by S.B. Pope for my studies. As the paper suggests limiting the production term, the Author of the book proves that the production term is actually bounded as (Exercise 5.21) |P|<= 2*k*S(l). k = Turbulent kinetic energy S(l) is the largest absolute value of the eigenvalues of the mean rate-of-strain tensor. I have not really tried limiting the production term till now because I am still studying whether the flow is stagnant there or not and should I limit the terms using explicit formulation of k. Any discussion in this field will be helpful. Thanks gtarang |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Turbulent Kinetic Energy for a one-equation model | wgvanveen | Main CFD Forum | 0 | March 25, 2015 07:26 |
turbulent energy spectrum | cfd.newbie | Siemens | 1 | June 20, 2008 00:48 |
turbulent energy spectrum | cfd.newbie | FLUENT | 0 | June 18, 2008 19:34 |
calculation of (turbulent) dissipation energy ? | max | Main CFD Forum | 3 | August 18, 1999 10:42 |
Why FVM for high-Re flows? | Zhong Lei | Main CFD Forum | 23 | May 14, 1999 14:22 |