|
[Sponsors] |
ANSYS Fluent vs. CFX for high-mach (Ma ~ 3.0) flows |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
February 20, 2017, 18:25 |
ANSYS Fluent vs. CFX for high-mach (Ma ~ 3.0) flows
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi.
I have been researching and found that in the past, Fluent is better for high-mach number flows while CFX is good for internal flows with rotating machinery. Is this still valid in recent versions of ANSYS? The geometry that I'm simulating is rotating about its axis and is external flow with air speed set as a boundary condition ranging from Ma = 0.1 to Ma = 3.0 (think high-speed airfoil simulation). There will be shock formations as well as high speed flow separation in the trailing edge.
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ask about the use of computers to simulate the fan with ansys fluent and cfx. | kornengineer | Hardware | 3 | December 15, 2014 18:21 |
Different flow patterns in CFX and Fluent | avi@lpsc | FLUENT | 4 | April 8, 2012 07:12 |
Ansys Fluid Flows (FLUENT) | Sze | FLUENT | 3 | June 19, 2011 04:41 |
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) | gravis | ANSYS | 3 | March 24, 2011 03:43 |
few quesions on ANSYS ICEMCFD and FLUENT | Prakash.Paudel | ANSYS | 0 | August 12, 2010 13:07 |