CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

ANSYS Fluent vs. CFX for high-mach (Ma ~ 3.0) flows

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   February 20, 2017, 18:25
Default ANSYS Fluent vs. CFX for high-mach (Ma ~ 3.0) flows
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 10
topspin247 is on a distinguished road
Hi.

I have been researching and found that in the past, Fluent is better for high-mach number flows while CFX is good for internal flows with rotating machinery. Is this still valid in recent versions of ANSYS?

The geometry that I'm simulating is rotating about its axis and is external flow with air speed set as a boundary condition ranging from Ma = 0.1 to Ma = 3.0 (think high-speed airfoil simulation).

There will be shock formations as well as high speed flow separation in the trailing edge.

  1. Is fluent or CFX better for this study?
  2. Should I use SST or realizable k-epsilon? Or is there a better RANS model for these conditions?
  3. I believe that density-based is better than pressure-based in this situation.
topspin247 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ask about the use of computers to simulate the fan with ansys fluent and cfx. kornengineer Hardware 3 December 15, 2014 18:21
Different flow patterns in CFX and Fluent avi@lpsc FLUENT 4 April 8, 2012 07:12
Ansys Fluid Flows (FLUENT) Sze FLUENT 3 June 19, 2011 04:41
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent) gravis ANSYS 3 March 24, 2011 03:43
few quesions on ANSYS ICEMCFD and FLUENT Prakash.Paudel ANSYS 0 August 12, 2010 13:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:41.