CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Mesh Grid Study - Result Tolerance - Lift, Drag, Moment.

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   November 9, 2016, 12:40
Default Mesh Grid Study - Result Tolerance - Lift, Drag, Moment.
  #1
Member
 
William
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 10
Wingman is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I'm trying to find the correct density of my Airfoil Mesh. I have results of lift, drag and moment of the Airfoil using 20x meshes with Number of Cells between 4.000 and 600.000 with fixed velocity and fixed angle of attack.

Let's assume that the finest mesh gives the 'correct' results but I would like to find the coarsest mesh that gives correct results within some tolerance.

Are there any rule of thumb of tolerance? I've been using Lift Tolerance, Drag Tolerance and Moment Tolerance of 0.01, 0.0001 and 0.01 respectively but I'm not sure if they are correct. According to them my grid isn't converged yet.

Here is an example of the results.

Cells .....Drag Coeff ..... Lift Coeff.......... Moment Coeff
397150 | 4.719471e-02 | 7.436299e-01 | -1.096162e-02
480996 | 4.817767e-02 | 7.527957e-01 | -1.121976e-02
572866 | 4.770149e-02 | 7.576630e-01 | -1.125989e-02


I don't have measured data so I don't know the true values.
Wingman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 9, 2016, 14:47
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
The key to a successful grid sensitivity analysis is controlling all other sources of error and making sure their contribution is much lower than the error you expect from the spatial discretization.
It would be better to use relative tolerances instead of absolute tolerances with different magnitude.
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 9, 2016, 19:29
Default
  #3
Member
 
William
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 10
Wingman is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by flotus1 View Post
The key to a successful grid sensitivity analysis is controlling all other sources of error and making sure their contribution is much lower than the error you expect from the spatial discretization.
It would be better to use relative tolerances instead of absolute tolerances with different magnitude.
http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F
Thanks for this, just tried this method using the numbers I provided in first post. The results are for for drag, lift and momentum respectively (vertical) and for {21} and {32} horizontally.


φ_ext =

-0.4755 -0.4165
-7.4158 -6.5702
0.1106 0.0967


e_a =

0.0100 0.0204
0.0064 0.0122
0.0036 0.0230


e_a_ext =

1.1003 1.1157
1.1022 1.1146
1.1018 1.1160


GCI_fine =

0.1366
0.0879
0.0488


So... Am I supposed to use:
0.1366 * 4.770149e-02 = 0.0065 (instead of 0.0001 for drag)
0.0879 * 7.576630e-01 = 0.0666 (instead of 0.01 for lift)
0.0488 * -1.125989e-02 = -0.0005 (instead of 0.01 for momentum)
Wingman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 9, 2016, 19:40
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49
flotus1 has a spectacular aura aboutflotus1 has a spectacular aura about
Take a look at your drag results: they either show oscillatory convergence or there is an error not related to the cell size. Either way, extrapolating the results is not an option.
To be more clear: have you made sure that all other sources of error are negligible compared to the spatial discretization error? I am especially thinking about iterative errors from running too few iterations.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 14, 2016, 17:50
Default
  #5
New Member
 
asdfad
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norway/Germany
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 14
Drunken_SheeP is on a distinguished road
Have you checked there is really no more change in the values with more iterations? Also, how did you refine the grid? Did you refine all grid parameters equally?
Drunken_SheeP is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
airfoil 2d, convergance, result, tolerance


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to calculate lift, drag and lift distribution in Star CCM+? israelcasillas94 STAR-CCM+ 4 November 6, 2020 09:35
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range vaina74 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 37 July 20, 2020 06:38
wrong SU2 calculation for lift and drag coefficient for NAC4421 mechy SU2 7 January 9, 2017 06:18
[ANSYS Meshing] grid study, important questions hamid1 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 2 February 10, 2012 14:28
Lift and Drag Monitor Point Values Converging to Zero Josh CFX 24 May 9, 2011 11:38


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:42.