|
[Sponsors] |
Mesh Grid Study - Result Tolerance - Lift, Drag, Moment. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
November 9, 2016, 12:40 |
Mesh Grid Study - Result Tolerance - Lift, Drag, Moment.
|
#1 |
Member
William
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi,
I'm trying to find the correct density of my Airfoil Mesh. I have results of lift, drag and moment of the Airfoil using 20x meshes with Number of Cells between 4.000 and 600.000 with fixed velocity and fixed angle of attack. Let's assume that the finest mesh gives the 'correct' results but I would like to find the coarsest mesh that gives correct results within some tolerance. Are there any rule of thumb of tolerance? I've been using Lift Tolerance, Drag Tolerance and Moment Tolerance of 0.01, 0.0001 and 0.01 respectively but I'm not sure if they are correct. According to them my grid isn't converged yet. Here is an example of the results. Cells .....Drag Coeff ..... Lift Coeff.......... Moment Coeff 397150 | 4.719471e-02 | 7.436299e-01 | -1.096162e-02 480996 | 4.817767e-02 | 7.527957e-01 | -1.121976e-02 572866 | 4.770149e-02 | 7.576630e-01 | -1.125989e-02 I don't have measured data so I don't know the true values. |
|
November 9, 2016, 14:47 |
|
#2 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
The key to a successful grid sensitivity analysis is controlling all other sources of error and making sure their contribution is much lower than the error you expect from the spatial discretization.
It would be better to use relative tolerances instead of absolute tolerances with different magnitude. http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Ansys..._inaccurate.3F |
|
November 9, 2016, 19:29 |
|
#3 | |
Member
William
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
φ_ext = -0.4755 -0.4165 -7.4158 -6.5702 0.1106 0.0967 e_a = 0.0100 0.0204 0.0064 0.0122 0.0036 0.0230 e_a_ext = 1.1003 1.1157 1.1022 1.1146 1.1018 1.1160 GCI_fine = 0.1366 0.0879 0.0488 So... Am I supposed to use: 0.1366 * 4.770149e-02 = 0.0065 (instead of 0.0001 for drag) 0.0879 * 7.576630e-01 = 0.0666 (instead of 0.01 for lift) 0.0488 * -1.125989e-02 = -0.0005 (instead of 0.01 for momentum) |
||
November 9, 2016, 19:40 |
|
#4 |
Super Moderator
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 3,427
Rep Power: 49 |
Take a look at your drag results: they either show oscillatory convergence or there is an error not related to the cell size. Either way, extrapolating the results is not an option.
To be more clear: have you made sure that all other sources of error are negligible compared to the spatial discretization error? I am especially thinking about iterative errors from running too few iterations. |
|
November 14, 2016, 17:50 |
|
#5 |
New Member
asdfad
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Norway/Germany
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 14 |
Have you checked there is really no more change in the values with more iterations? Also, how did you refine the grid? Did you refine all grid parameters equally?
|
|
Tags |
airfoil 2d, convergance, result, tolerance |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to calculate lift, drag and lift distribution in Star CCM+? | israelcasillas94 | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | November 6, 2020 09:35 |
decomposePar problem: Cell 0contains face labels out of range | vaina74 | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 37 | July 20, 2020 06:38 |
wrong SU2 calculation for lift and drag coefficient for NAC4421 | mechy | SU2 | 7 | January 9, 2017 06:18 |
[ANSYS Meshing] grid study, important questions | hamid1 | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | February 10, 2012 14:28 |
Lift and Drag Monitor Point Values Converging to Zero | Josh | CFX | 24 | May 9, 2011 11:38 |